From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B9FDED for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:30:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-vk0-f48.google.com (mail-vk0-f48.google.com [209.85.213.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6C414F for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id a188so90618092vkc.0 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 08:30:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Ctr4lG3Ik3+jY3B9SkardgBxnQ6CGadNFZFyVrV3EAA=; b=jY2rtmctebca0caz5eUDAuJKtvhKd+BfnV3dvnoLFB4+HCv2M24HU4XLH2ntBWo+xV 5TI3Ksb0PGE6btOJnZYatLK6mwCrYe02MQDwUIrah1KkIQjQADFePrkvDwdITOe09fqz VXeLMpkNrS/ffymcezciwtksvBU0TeDHqHITdAK6LKLmCbO7kMyFJ4MVs42fLTuzoMhB BLkKKKOsNLdv1Hw3JMZiq0wyQu6v20dUGK5uVG4GPSjYjv4aciGSvokYxX2WE+WveXFi IA6WTyoD+jDxAmto0rUV6IluF6MCGqEisbDV9ghUP+BznpULCXHWdx+XtkPyOmjBZDUv lfAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.146.66 with SMTP id u63mr8495625vkd.31.1450629045865; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 08:30:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.153.5 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 08:30:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.153.5 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 08:30:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50e629572d8de852eb789d50b34da308@xbt.hk> <1449961269.2210.5.camel@yahoo.com> <20151220112454.GB16187@muck> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 11:30:45 -0500 Message-ID: From: Chris Pacia To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143a94cfad0f4052756e4f9 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:14:22 +0000 Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Forget dormant UTXOs without confiscating bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 16:30:47 -0000 --001a1143a94cfad0f4052756e4f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Dec 20, 2015 6:34 AM, "Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > 2) This reverses the useful minimization attribute of HD wallets - "just backup the seed" It would be nice if the bip37 filter matching algorithm was extended to serve up the proof. And if server-based wallets did the same it would preserve the "just backup the seed" functionality. --001a1143a94cfad0f4052756e4f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Dec 20, 2015 6:34 AM, "Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> 2) This reverses the useful minimization attribute of HD wallets - "just backup the seed"

It would be nice if the bip37 filter matching algorithm was extended to serve up the proof.

And if server-based wallets did the same it would preserve the "just backup the seed" functionality.

--001a1143a94cfad0f4052756e4f9--