From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77DD4482 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:05:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F35291F0 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpg9 with SMTP id pg9so12800401igb.0 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:05:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=2RE+wRwfkI3oc8vLBuWVo2FjwI0vd3kD86e31QqIjYk=; b=QSeXF74BDURc7nQyACmejewEN9fMkOieo5AfrCvjAzKQspQ8eIn6rmWH7vyqJPuTmX iLZQaVqRQoD2gagila4YqnpFO6QheUgtFzz5vXom4VWHjYGpczWGv4Kgm5pFQPKnrNS/ xiA8HrCCawpDztWiF6dYbc+U+sK3K1c2QKQCMqAz6ZC0ZW95AsupQdOH/NBYGKb9vnw4 IfcFF7M1WDz1Alc48V9SDP/Hl3kjqPUrl8aptDQ9d9FssMvozoAnEOczcvj1y2DdLrjP kXZA1zsgLXf8e4dqN+MDrZilgRWbRGf9cX3NaP6xboF2aVQFGXmM2Zd146bIsWNFHZCx PKHQ== X-Received: by 10.50.13.34 with SMTP id e2mr5775273igc.23.1438268707534; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:05:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.15.164 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 08:04:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Greg Sanders Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:04:47 -0400 Message-ID: To: Pieter Wuille Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01182d04677ea6051c1907a1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size following technological growth X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:05:16 -0000 --089e01182d04677ea6051c1907a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 What, if any, methods would be used for miners to communicate their upgrade? Greg On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > here is a proposal for long-term scalability I've been working on: > https://gist.github.com/sipa/c65665fc360ca7a176a6 > > Some things are not included yet, such as a testnet whose size runs ahead > of the main chain, and the inclusion of Gavin's more accurate sigop > checking after the hard fork. > > Comments? > > -- > Pieter > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > --089e01182d04677ea6051c1907a1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What, if any, methods would be used for miners to communic= ate their upgrade?=C2=A0

=
Greg

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Pieter Wui= lle via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation= .org> wrote:
Hello all,

here is a proposal for long-= term scalability I've been working on: https://gist.github.com/sip= a/c65665fc360ca7a176a6

Some things are not included yet, s= uch as a testnet whose size runs ahead of the main chain, and the inclusion= of Gavin's more accurate sigop checking after the hard fork.

Comments?

--
=
Pieter

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


--089e01182d04677ea6051c1907a1--