From: Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
To: moonsettler <moonsettler@protonmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Development Mailing List <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] Time to add CSFS to Signet?
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 09:36:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB3F3DuJECHnTnOJNqru4qjJ_=L+NetVO7oNANEF9ZCK+mJo-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BWU6T8rrVsSA-FFm28kCe3wAtlC-OYmSgUgdCQ4BR3r5hmwYsvzbnuQ6qDt-4QMLliq-uHN_ahE6g85xOTVoE0-prpGNjv1depjIRokunw4=@protonmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3324 bytes --]
Correct.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 7:54 AM moonsettler <moonsettler@protonmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> > Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet
> is not BIP348 compliant.
> Wdym not compliant? Because it also has CSFSV?
>
> BR,
> moonsetler
>
> On Monday, March 24th, 2025 at 2:29 AM, Greg Sanders <gsanders87@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Noting that from my quick glance that the CSFS implemented in mutinynet
> is not BIP348 compliant. How much that matters for experimenters, I am not
> sure.
> > I opened a PR to inquisition to rectify the lack of BIP348-compatible
> PRs, at a minimum.
> >
> > Greg
> > On Monday, March 17, 2025 at 12:02:52 PM UTC-4 /dev /fd0 wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Weikeng,
> > > I agree that it has a lot of support among bitcoin developers. No
> objections for CSFS on [wiki][0]with evaluations from more than 50 bitcoin
> developers.
> > >
> > > Co-author of APO, Christian Decker has also expressed his support for
> it on [twitter][1]. Even Greg Maxwell considers it [useful][2].
> > >
> > > [0]: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Covenants_support
> > > [1]: https://x.com/Snyke/status/1895880013796556818
> > > [2]: https://freenode.irclog.whitequark.org/bitcoin-wizards/2019-11-28
> > >
> > > /dev/fd0
> > > floppy disk guy
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, 7:03 PM Weikeng Chen <weiken...@l2iterative.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I am writing just to solicit people's opinions on whether CSFS
> should be added to signet given that CTV + CSFS combination has recently
> received a lot of support. Although CTV has already been on signet for a
> few years, CSFS isn't.
> > > > With CTV and CSFS being on the signet also allows part of the
> LNHANCE to start experimenting, and it has been discussed that CSFS helps
> with BitVM by replacing Winternitz signatures completely with a much lower
> potential on-chain data availability overhead. This also allows
> applications relying on CTV + CSFS to develop further.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Weikeng
> > >
> > > > --
> > >
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to bitcoindev+...@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/2584bf15-8e7f-4d89-8987-f41dd06b2824n%40googlegroups.com
> .
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/cfaa1df8-44bb-4d1a-9e3b-3f390421a23cn%40googlegroups.com
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAB3F3DuJECHnTnOJNqru4qjJ_%3DL%2BNetVO7oNANEF9ZCK%2BmJo-g%40mail.gmail.com.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5063 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-26 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 3:38 [bitcoindev] Time to add CSFS to Signet? Weikeng Chen
2025-03-17 14:11 ` 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025-03-17 14:43 ` /dev /fd0
2025-03-20 13:10 ` Greg Sanders
2025-03-26 11:54 ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025-03-26 13:36 ` Greg Sanders [this message]
2025-03-17 22:52 ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2025-03-18 6:55 ` Weikeng Chen
2025-03-18 16:40 ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAB3F3DuJECHnTnOJNqru4qjJ_=L+NetVO7oNANEF9ZCK+mJo-g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gsanders87@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoindev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=moonsettler@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox