public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ruddy <mruddybtc@gmail.com>
To: Sergio Demian Lerner <sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com>
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] If you had a single chance to double the transactions/second Bitcoin allows...
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:44:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABFP+yPCD9pOVCb28smdxQisvfnTb48=2yVg_CkGmg_6PzKjow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKzdR-o7_A2N=-=3muXcs7ptnoO2d3wSBAMAziNGs7XjnceGBQ@mail.gmail.com>

Sergio, you raise an interesting question.

I had seen your message to the list related to this idea before [1],
so I went back to research what the viewpoints and conclusions were,
if any.

I didn't find anything too conclusive, but I did find some persuasive
points by Dave Hudson [2] [3] [4] [5] that seem to also favor
increasing the target block creation rate (decreasing the target time
interval between blocks).

Considering that increasing the target block creation rate could
reduce the effect of (but not solve [6]) the fundamental mismatch
between transaction creation and the Poisson process of block
discovery [7] and could reduce miner variance (possibly an aid to
miner decentralization), I think I'd go with option B to answer your
question.

I wonder why this does not seem to ever gain more traction when you
bring it up? The idea does not seem crazy.

[1]: https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07663.html
[2]: https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg07665.html
[3]: https://twitter.com/hashingitcom/status/595615823340908545
[4]: https://twitter.com/hashingitcom/status/605443289379143680
[5]: http://hashingit.com/analysis/34-bitcoin-traffic-bulletin
[6]: https://twitter.com/jgarzik/status/595611423151030272
[7]: http://gavinandresen.ninja/why-increasing-the-max-block-size-is-urgent


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-10 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-07 21:18 [bitcoin-dev] If you had a single chance to double the transactions/second Bitcoin allows Sergio Demian Lerner
2015-08-07 21:27 ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-08-07 21:37   ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2015-08-07 22:46     ` Natanael
2015-08-07 23:01       ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-08-07 23:08       ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2015-08-07 23:17         ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-08-10 20:44 ` Michael Ruddy [this message]
2015-08-10 21:01 ` Pieter Wuille
2015-08-10 22:11   ` Sergio Demian Lerner
2015-08-10 22:31     ` Pieter Wuille

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABFP+yPCD9pOVCb28smdxQisvfnTb48=2yVg_CkGmg_6PzKjow@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mruddybtc@gmail.com \
    --cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sergio.d.lerner@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox