From: Ittay <ittay.eyal@cornell.edu>
To: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Ittay Eyal <ittay.eyal@cornell.edu>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin-NG whitepaper.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:28:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABT1wW=xqShMGU0+eDiNyNkr-77fQ_HnyKL87C6iGL-xq8BYVw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABaSBaxWAsEG71FTy4SrVu94BXokeozmJ80tjsNU8ERpTfFaFA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Emin Gün Sirer
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > while the whitepaper has all the nitty gritty details:
> > http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02037
>
> Taking reward compensation back by fraud proofs is not enough to fix
> the problems associated with double spending (such as, everyone has to
> wait for the "real" confirmations instead of the "possibly
> double-spend" confirmations). Some of this was discussed in -wizards
> recently:
> http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-09-19.log
Fraud proof removes all the attacker's revenue. It's like the attacker
sacrifices an entire block for double spending in the current system. I
think Luke-Jr got it right at that discussion.
Best,
Ittay
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1555 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 18:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 18:02 [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin-NG whitepaper Emin Gün Sirer
2015-10-14 18:12 ` Bryan Bishop
2015-10-14 18:28 ` Ittay [this message]
2015-10-14 18:57 ` Matt Corallo
2015-10-15 15:09 ` Ittay
2015-10-28 2:08 ` Matt Corallo
2015-11-06 20:48 ` Ittay
2015-10-14 18:14 ` Sergio Demian Lerner
[not found] ` <20151014182055.GC23875@mcelrath.org>
2015-10-14 18:38 ` Ittay
2015-10-14 18:39 ` Emin Gün Sirer
2015-10-14 22:21 ` odinn
2015-10-15 1:59 ` Matt Corallo
2015-10-15 8:48 ` odinn
2015-10-15 15:12 ` Ittay
2015-10-15 18:43 ` odinn
2015-10-14 20:52 ` Bob McElrath
2015-11-09 18:33 ` Emin Gün Sirer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABT1wW=xqShMGU0+eDiNyNkr-77fQ_HnyKL87C6iGL-xq8BYVw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ittay.eyal@cornell.edu \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kanzure@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox