On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:56 AM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
past the triggering block. A block-chain re-org of two thousand or
more blocks on the main Bitcoin chain is unthinkable-- the economic
chaos would be massive, and the reaction to such a drastic (and
extremely unlikely) event would certainly be a hastily imposed
checkpoint to get everybody back onto the chain that everybody was
using for economic transactions.

No, the "triggering block" you mentioned is NOT where the hardfork starts. Using BIP101 as an example, the hardfork starts when the first >1MB is mined. For people who failed to upgrade, the "grace period" is always zero, which is the moment they realize a hardfork.

Are there any plans written down anywhere about the "hastily imposed checkpoint" scenario? As far as I know, we would have to check-point on both blockchains because of the way that hard-forks work (creating two separate chains and/or networks). Nothing about this should be an "emergency", we have all the time in the world to prepare a safe and responsible way to upgrade the network without unilaterally declaring obsolescence.

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507