From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YORhr-0005oS-Vx for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:03:55 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.170; envelope-from=kanzure@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f170.google.com; Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YORhp-0004nx-NM for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:03:55 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id va2so14619364obc.1 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:03:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.56.71 with SMTP id y7mr3079871obp.36.1424354628284; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.22.7 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:03:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54DE7601.4070509@voskuil.org> <54DF07A5.1060004@voskuil.org> <54DF2E80.5060506@voskuil.org> <20150214131320.GA26731@savin.petertodd.org> <3D4F2E23-CADE-4FE7-B960-3F79815E868C@bitsofproof.com> <20150215170228.GB21269@savin.petertodd.org> <20150219033205.GS14804@nl.grid.coop> <065C5F2E-FC1D-4994-A39A-9125D663FC71@petertodd.org> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 08:03:48 -0600 Message-ID: From: Bryan Bishop To: Tamas Blummer , Bryan Bishop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1ecb2a7372b050f7167cd X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (kanzure[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YORhp-0004nx-NM Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On Rewriting Bitcoin (was Re: [Libbitcoin] Satoshi client: is a fork past 0.10 possible?) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:03:56 -0000 --e89a8fb1ecb2a7372b050f7167cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Tamas Blummer wrote: > I launched a Lighthouse project to add Java Language Binding to lib > consensus. Let's turn the debate to a constructive vote. First, I strongly disagree with voting here for reasons that I hope others will elaborate on. Second, I think that squeezing all possible language bindings into a project is also unproductive. What is it that the webkit people did for this? I think they had gobject bindings, and then all of the languages have their own gobject bridge to take advantage of that. Naturally the downside here is that gobject means you have a gtk dependency. A similar solution would be interesting and worth exploring, though, especially if something similar without gtk exists. - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 --e89a8fb1ecb2a7372b050f7167cd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com> wrote:
I =C2=A0launched a L= ighthouse project to add Java Language Binding to lib consensus. Let's = turn the debate to a constructive vote.

First, I stro= ngly disagree with voting here for reasons that I hope others will elaborat= e on. Second, I think that squeezing all possible language bindings into a = project is also unproductive. What is it that the webkit people did for thi= s? I think they had gobject bindings, and then all of the languages have th= eir own gobject bridge to take advantage of that. Naturally the downside he= re is that gobject means you have a gtk dependency. A similar solution woul= d be interesting and worth exploring, though, especially if something simil= ar without gtk exists.

- B= ryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 = 203 0507
--e89a8fb1ecb2a7372b050f7167cd--