From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
To: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Cc: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] fork types (Re: An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork.)
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 17:10:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABaSBawj0pXZ0owZemL9CUkRwgP3J2MJKVzGk+GmSEMUCsQ_DQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALqxMTF_PundsEawyYcinJHyvJJTN-iK0MjWfzpD7QDN448P1Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2264 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Adam Back via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> There is also another type of fork a firm hard fork that can do the
> same but for format changes that are not possible with a soft-fork.
>
I was drafting an email for a new thread with some links about this topic,
instead I'll just send this as a reply now that we are writing down fork
types...
auxiliary blocks and evil soft-forks or forced soft-forks:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=283746.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=874313.0
soft-fork block size increase using extension blocks:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008356.html
generalized soft-forks:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/012073.html
bip102 forced soft-fork:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/012153.html
extension blocks were also discussed in this interview:
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-sidechains-unchained-epicenter-adam3us-gmaxwell/
.... also there was something about a "soft-hard fork".
some discussion from today re: origin of the term evil fork, evil
soft-fork, forced soft-fork:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3yrsxt/bitcoindev_an_implementation_of_bip102_as_a/cyg2g7q
some much older discussion about extension blocks and sidechains:
http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-01-01.log
some discussion about "generalized soft-forks" and extension blocks and
evil soft-forks:
http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-12-20.log
some discussion about evil forks and evil soft-forks and extension blocks:
http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-12-30.log
segwit soft-fork makes use of a similar idea:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-December/011865.html
https://bitcoin.org/en/bitcoin-core/capacity-increases-faq
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/segregated-witness-and-its-impact-on-scalability/
Note: I am taking the term "forced soft-fork" from petertodd; it's pretty
much the same thing as "evil fork" in every way but intent.
This is an x-post from
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1296628.msg13400092#msg13400092
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4347 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-30 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-30 23:05 [bitcoin-dev] fork types (Re: An implementation of BIP102 as a softfork.) Adam Back
2015-12-30 23:10 ` Bryan Bishop [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABaSBawj0pXZ0owZemL9CUkRwgP3J2MJKVzGk+GmSEMUCsQ_DQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kanzure@gmail.com \
--cc=adam@cypherspace.org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox