From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
To: CANNON <cannon@cannon-ciota.info>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Single signature for all transactions in a block?
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 17:46:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABaSBayhm5TChEAbHboA7CLAye0nyDBqXty3bAmJ9+uC7RahMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b50376f5-1a40-1475-04be-1b6aef0bbd74@cannon-ciota.info>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1401 bytes --]
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 5:39 PM, CANNON via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I had a question relating to scaling and privacy enhancements.
> I believe that segwit combined with aggregated signatures
> and coinjoin can potentially achieve such. The idea is to
> use aggregated signatures in conjunction with coinjoin. So
> that all inputs of a coinjoin transaction would have a single
> signature vastly decreasing size while having privacy at the
> same time. If majority of transactions in a block did this I
> assume that significant more transactions could be fit into a
> block?
Here are some resources to read regarding signature aggregation and
scalability:
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/bitcoin-core-dev-tech/2017-09-06-signature-aggregation/
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/gmaxwell-2017-08-28-deep-dive-bitcoin-core-v0.15/#signature-aggregation
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/milan/schnorr-signatures/
https://bitcoincore.org/en/2017/03/23/schnorr-signature-aggregation/
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1377298.0
https://bitcoincore.org/logs/2016-05-zurich-meeting-notes.html
https://github.com/sipa/secp256k1/blob/968e2f415a5e764d159ee03e95815ea11460854e/src/modules/schnorr/schnorr.md
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/2016-july-bitcoin-developers-miners-meeting/dan-boneh/
- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2665 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-31 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-31 23:39 [bitcoin-dev] Single signature for all transactions in a block? CANNON
2017-12-31 23:46 ` Bryan Bishop [this message]
2017-12-31 23:49 ` Rhavar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABaSBayhm5TChEAbHboA7CLAye0nyDBqXty3bAmJ9+uC7RahMQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kanzure@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cannon@cannon-ciota.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox