From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA51CE8C for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:17:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com [209.85.213.179]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EBE0F3 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id to4so23783455igc.0 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 10:17:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pPaUILNjl+NAPSTe8uBfgB7FEPfEkBXQ8RWsYyhC7uQ=; b=RivYhGcAB/9cCDNHN2SZC7xXzfSqvG1OLLEz4LgdghFAUccJbyjVgNCJFndr2cIdPK 28fYdBYJVdVVJzkG90BoHOrh3/Ihsw4WNdDM6CIsE44qgXR1BETQ+Wb9N1MTCS5USQpP zHiwuGGeuSLjtFBNeEdx4+WuXqbPRRr9+8x2d8SWcioY9WCXbqUGqMoiW3visBkaKbZU 2nGA+LF9zTaAAZr2KX4at/rqlCQ5sm8qKYAoryqS7tFdlePKse2VFYu3eO7xxVNHpmYr HuF8YWrbbeVW4l6WCl1UbzGBt4O2Hw+1HkBTD39HblGerX7jZylg9xFHrYgDd9ZGNpRt qamw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.36.69 with SMTP id o5mr14606228igj.3.1450635450879; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 10:17:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.66.132 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 10:17:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1bf64a5b514d57ca37744ae5f5238149@openmailbox.org> References: <1bf64a5b514d57ca37744ae5f5238149@openmailbox.org> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 12:17:30 -0600 Message-ID: From: Bryan Bishop To: joe2015@openmailbox.org, Bryan Bishop Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013a0026bf98d4052758626a X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Increasing the blocksize as a (generalized) softfork. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 18:17:32 -0000 --089e013a0026bf98d4052758626a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:56 AM, joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > An Arbitrary Block-size Increase Via a Generalized Softfork > This seems conceptually similar to "extension blocks": https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-May/008356.html https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=283746.0 http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-12-20.log "Extended blocks" are also mentioned over here too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1296628.msg13307275#msg13307275 - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 --089e013a0026bf98d4052758626a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= un, Dec 20, 2015 at 4:56 AM, joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev &= lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
An Arbitrary= Block-size Increase Via a Generalized Softfork

This seems conceptually similar to "extension blocks":
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-Ma= y/008356.html
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?top= ic=3D283746.0
http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-= 12-20.log

"Extended blocks" are also mentioned over he= re too:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3D1296628.msg= 13307275#msg13307275

- Bryan
= http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507
--089e013a0026bf98d4052758626a--