From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3398571
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:03:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com
	[209.85.212.169])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DAAE176
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wicja10 with SMTP id ja10so24676093wic.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 06:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=eOQjbFg8vtHPu6EJKxqZlCwR8FG/vghF+67s4LGocZ4=;
	b=G6x4soXey8/e+4SYKKw+PHjjBf1exV3SfNEkC0Xht1REK1kn5HkJadE0IbVasDZkov
	lXgRJLpIFgtQwFZd1eEmQxCISxXmtI0TgjfJ1iFFdeeA4eYjmdueYAporcUUaWJPR5Cl
	mjemS/gFMDOG3LUBHDBBuveI79OnJL3sAO59I79hS5z9LThRaojuVXTptlGmqbs9saP6
	NpPoRyrKsqiAhQrUx8XgpuPzx13aRn6dkLrTRjv0sm+fdlJtmUm9EXqCGmgbP1ivtOpJ
	/314Y7yTmj+RbqyKtf6lakgLll2wBKivDvTQ/D/mtHpCisTOorF5slljNdISnjfQQ0cA
	IDVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkslQuCH/rdnbjU/lL57hHI5k+4ufgEAj2BVU7rrQ7fhXsJfpfvNp/gmbzCHOlfftIAurKw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr43747730wjb.133.1439211786995; 
	Mon, 10 Aug 2015 06:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.31.230 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 06:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADJgMzusJG6N-nYujMXw-NtELYmykvBsUau3=L9WCySJTkDqKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABsx9T16fH+56isq95m4+QWsKwP==tf75ep8ghnEcBoV4OtZJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBgOt=qhQVZv5P-4mcD75=L4PKgOfRqhyB6FZdSYQajrwQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABsx9T10y6-=c7Qg6jysnf38wRX3NA3wWozxGfE+mEYJvPeqWA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDpwMQzju+Gsoe3qMi60MPr7OAiSuigy3RdA1xh-SwFzbw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABm2gDoz4NMEQuQj6UHCYYCwihZrEC4Az8xDvTBwiZDf9eQ7-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADJgMzusJG6N-nYujMXw-NtELYmykvBsUau3=L9WCySJTkDqKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:03:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDo-xRt6LtG6e98s6z5kJmR=FR2Gei=y3=KY18aAT+DR3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fees and the block-finding process
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:03:10 -0000

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com> wrote:
> Additionally, correct me if I am wrong, but the net effect from preventing
> fees rising from zero would be to guarantee miners have no alternative
> income from fees as block subsidy dries up and thus harm the incentives to
> secure the chain.

I don't think that's necessarily true. Theoretically urgent
transactions could fund hashing power on their own while there are
still some free non-urgent transactions being mined from time to time.