From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB52C49B for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 05:37:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ua0-f181.google.com (mail-ua0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E47FF for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 05:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ua0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e55so23500558uaa.2 for ; Tue, 09 May 2017 22:37:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bph+pRZb6DHm8I0RMsIWO1rKh1Fcs1HzLseioMJAK94=; b=rVjps3fDCuGwaSTgSDoStXXIaEDzB0n2yWxyOaPiNv1RQ6iEKGi5Sk6phv7ev2ACws pVntc7NG4dzCa4zCLzyYeQNVyq10nLyobuohBEHLg6KZVk/Vs+HP9gDiNGkUlGqgTp35 D/kQ0tScZxYMY+SCAC4Y19p/oTd7yfhgc+CNO4wBiweiFpxwTMUlGLHMdLzXO/FvzAcg BBPIyGdeP/dqK8Ddn/I1VAVzys0W/+hUygC6aHkLxnsQ3mzroeX/31DDZEBZ+cRdLSS7 IfcMWxyguwD+bqzOBiUH0CjJSHKmiSWgAOAc4I9wpOwyU9x6NfKazFq4anXytEkaVF/i QS7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bph+pRZb6DHm8I0RMsIWO1rKh1Fcs1HzLseioMJAK94=; b=LRUqiTsMT8EUHE62lFSZQpdpZF8KSg8yAXxmShryYYyUS2SWS0+F2ZdgLDltn2XDP4 1SzNRoKWJwQHRDjM2QWWfDByV+3PRwIUF9g+sA4Ku48Um5oS9pbTIDw+pfWjQPSvbS18 fFZbikUc5g7ayxkC5qrKd8K7yivwNsTDL6UuB7tm2oJP5QEXFswgmlE/27TtY7FO1Vy4 ttVZX4+Dn2Yx/l9aC0DoQkFVTzTNKlDPerHiL7lG4oLtooHgtyRjAcdWCYHc3qhVCH/0 IJhqq9au/xlLQvczjqnM5QaLFL7zN3rZdytVCPYYTGt9KNg0xwfAUSV7yiNfPMuC1+jv /oEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcAUnFNusa4Gruv0bb7j3YWQOToCaYZC0ZwVSAOZ6cfhJyGyBrx4 fMHQpuvynLIIVFsG8bCofyMx4NiL5w== X-Received: by 10.159.37.105 with SMTP id 96mr1934130uaz.92.1494394654275; Tue, 09 May 2017 22:37:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.31.151.200 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2017 22:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.151.200 with HTTP; Tue, 9 May 2017 22:37:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 07:37:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Sergio Demian Lerner Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c0cba3685d1d9054f24de95 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some real-world results about the current Segwit Discount X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 05:37:39 -0000 --94eb2c0cba3685d1d9054f24de95 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 If there's a better factor than 0.25 I would change it now before deploying segwit instead of leaving it to be changed later with a hf. On 9 May 2017 10:59 pm, "Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I agree with you Matt. > I'm artificially limiting myself to changing the parameters of Segwit as > it is.. > > This is motivated by the idea that a consensual HF in the current state > would have greater chance of acceptance if it changes the minimum number of > lines of code. > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > >> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Matt Corallo >> wrote: >> > at beast. >> >> Rawr. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > --94eb2c0cba3685d1d9054f24de95 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If there's a better factor than 0.25 I would change i= t now before deploying segwit instead of leaving it to be changed later wit= h a hf.=C2=A0

On 9 May 2017 10:59 pm, "Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev" = <bitcoin-dev@li= sts.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
I agree with you Matt.=C2=A0
I'= m artificially limiting myself to changing the parameters of Segwit as it i= s..=C2=A0

This is motivated by the idea that a con= sensual HF in the current state would have greater chance of acceptance if = it changes the minimum number of lines of code.


On = Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Gregory Maxwell <greg@xiph.org> wr= ote:
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Matt= Corallo <= lf-lists@mattcorallo.com> wrote:
> at beast.

Rawr.


_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org= /mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

--94eb2c0cba3685d1d9054f24de95--