From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AB4305 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:03:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14C38E9 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicnd19 with SMTP id nd19so49751648wic.1 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 05:03:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/QFrS0RwDOuVz0Um1YjeEGow743m5mI2P1alBuawMC8=; b=VTXHoDo5BFnNObDHd35Ah1vIiDMnZxYXEotYwOQR7TakXdLM+2mjOq7DKvvInFTemL C1Qw4P4AIiqUb/SzGTie+r0qfoq9KcxjqdwTpJ6GqPp5lFHHBlnmEfWUqDnHWmw+2IW6 tNjv22qSP9Demgjwi29EPzPBXiOqQ8VQLM7iFlRpCqm3go+27XbieUr9ofPlnTNuhM8X wFZYls9XFy1F6gLWZ918R7M+Zuz5brEtFqt89oXedGLSuGTiehX+x9pJfJ1QhIu5fYRV gsfkvhIKymgxiu0s8dS7h6JZdSYfKc8izEo5pfdw5bkPTbvVH/QrbpTZNHdxt1hg/zpP 8x3A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSEflD/alkr3HnTijCS5AoPxPjsPo4FRbU5upoG1L2R2WvJdYPDsnRnM8KXzixerDscXMS MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr19662551wjb.133.1435493023488; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 05:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.95.168 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 05:03:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150627120935.GD25420@amethyst.visucore.com> References: <20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com> <20150627120935.GD25420@amethyst.visucore.com> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 14:03:43 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:03:45 -0000 On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote: > - minor issues (maybe solving the time-warp issue with mining) issues planned on the long term This. > Note that anything non-critical and non-controversial can be planned and time-locked, say, 5 years ahead, obliviating the need for anyone to quickly upgrade their client. Yes, I specificalyl say that here https://github.com/jtimon/bips/blob/bip-forks/bip-forks.org#code (just with 4 years instead of 5).