From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0710E42A for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:08:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B29112 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so102475634wic.1 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:08:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3S3AmWtElBLKuFWL5B+r7UbgOYa6+uJX32NtRyp74d4=; b=kXtsd47sY68LAN0LTsvbEhVfl7g91XcGHjTwL9zZsMVvncagf61GKj11SxIU60sfiZ FeUjKcIFSjFMeesEPvxPG0Q6FqumNek1TmM2dTIKOQ2MH1tnh3Rk7A4tO/5NifqYUSX3 iS9V0mLOf6EWjLlB8bTUgoGM5i9aob1E++lq3zZA2lGMH3+SNnh5sKGOYM1Rm/afQLV5 YXPrEViXBW62YLq5vVAvcnFb/zzBrX5rn8sxc+U0djWMzbvd+FSMWNOoHyfFOjWKB6V8 ZGEiQic0bBD75WYNtqCOSZvyM9hnFynuoujLNcUkO/QcTbUhbA68tZsGCAqbGF3omDpV 5u5Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmRFVSzJZx6qRKDrqs/Et2UU5/Z/2cCyCBlsHkHsr18B0UBPwSmm1OKAl26GmMGJPgfYwlZ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr52388051wjb.133.1437988128842; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.95.168 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.95.168 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:08:48 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Kalle Rosenbaum Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011600029c83e1051bd7b31e X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Bitcoin-development] BIP for Proof of Payment X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:08:51 -0000 --089e011600029c83e1051bd7b31e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jul 26, 2015 11:13 PM, "Kalle Rosenbaum" wrote: > Do you think we need a bigger nonce? In that case, why? I don't know, it wasn't me that proposed a bigger nonce. I just wanted to point out that the policy limit shouldn't be a concern. --089e011600029c83e1051bd7b31e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Jul 26, 2015 11:13 PM, "Kalle Rosenbaum" <kalle@rosenbaum.se> wrote:
> Do you think we need a bigger nonce? In that case, why?

I don't know, it wasn't me that proposed a bigger nonce. I just wanted to point out that the policy limit shouldn't be a concern.

--089e011600029c83e1051bd7b31e--