From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3E6EC1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:23:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com (mail-vk0-f51.google.com
	[209.85.213.51])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEBAA2F
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:23:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f2so20761972vkb.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:23:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=jtimon-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=IePyQl4S0a9L6OqdKO0HKUYN68055iWsGQD/ABomloY=;
	b=chHXnZmxvRNQPIzm7uAqSZc85HLX3ppERXxvT8iImIY19yPU0WR2kB2QAIa10YvVjT
	cJIx2xoVHQkAWjPW55ce7BYhqCE0VxeF82fGMrifdY/8d490vQXl+zXcT4NWlXmXhS4W
	/IT6/RAxfXz05OlTUx2m9VK4H/IUwuQYUcjoN/IxlHyAJq7rNqIPD5Gv/iDj36z/YH/A
	IJ0IibewF/DWHvQGCOj7bfvQFLjH6JzPoc7DpvAvrhJWw2Pw3iH1OXa04s+4JLK/SrbR
	Qc3gKrtfPPMG7OHkX5P3AjP1xcKPtWA+xBqihtrAKltiJACmQ1nGlRHouI21/QMGFfM6
	xICg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=IePyQl4S0a9L6OqdKO0HKUYN68055iWsGQD/ABomloY=;
	b=cIECZJJt+3BpqM9mQvonZKpHxFM1JZAtzvxdm08Z+NS3/PpTjX/FX2vakhpweudID2
	um/TfZljkAL4cJsXSvcZ+xnxnOlX33xixvvgiIOemH6yxb8MMaP98nN3lbrCDUIuwwW0
	2RM85GfW9KDpQOOkmXSY0ryJ/aESnaMfiCcU0eQFUWNttmKR4JVji9+95xC20XNbeh0L
	GM61KhFNHHLQ8F61ANB+estUeSY7LY673dPvrZs7Bx6xgf2Uu105iZ+wFJNfa1qr40BZ
	Mgsmjhd59q96n8Mc2Nsd+HWGpY8q1+FEeve48LBRPNNuizNEjvTVF4gR0oAYKEh1hDhe
	oB1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4DcUeT13jFhCK5nzT3qsTsAFWkZ0eMUH0oZsNB15p75OixdqIq38T9YGAVrbDa2TECN2i7yyt/UV5VZb/0LQvzpnZNA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.6.131 with SMTP id 125mr1039407vkg.140.1450416205978;
	Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:23:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.236.70 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 21:23:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151217194407.GB1351@muck>
References: <CADm_WcasDuBsop55ZWcTb2FvccaoREg8K032rUjgQUQhQ3g=XA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBi=Mw7UnxG1-0-0ZTRqxrS5+28VmowyYrGP2MAvYiu_pA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADm_Wcae7OK7kyXkfh+7XFrc2WYsv7T1Va3_E=5om+XYrL9pOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPg+sBimfFVea4Sorgx=DaMPVs1k1DrmTA2ZFdLFtxrqKm23-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE-z3OVD67rDefFzbpuzTO0=54_hJzSfSPg735zk_vjsANmEhQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20151217194407.GB1351@muck>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 06:23:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CABm2gDpvW-s0dqvzxukWiaTwtPxAn9Pj2jHxLDz+ARUzwnTE9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size: It's economics & user preparation &
 moral hazard
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:23:27 -0000

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> If Bitcoin remains decentralized, miners have veto power over any
> blocksize increases. You can always soft-fork in a blocksize reduction
> in a decentralized blockchain that actually works.

You can always schism hardfork miners out...