From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AE64E5A for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:37:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B5F15F for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laboe4 with SMTP id oe4so25447867lab.0 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:37:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tRnWfQOXr9hW5zNgGTkh0qWkC5irErhoVb2MaU2s0Tk=; b=cpd467G4nuSYJLWXWw2Bs7dDQohQus3/bwjnRJQODIUImOpwN7CKQOpxXouj0vjKuL VGMFuOOFdlJm1It7LSOcYrepXHaQAffZLraafAXpKxUsxZYld23GPA5SoeqgBstE9VHO J+C0SdrEP000toFfnf66F9dVk8Yw46wDaGRz1VkGBkn6f7ajEQQ6RxG/eRZ/SfPxJXiU pOF8t/u5Tkkj8o6qFLvolapQadpDi+jL2Vdf0JvVCe1YUPdg4fR5jIL/Pu7t2uUal+CE sZ73upuq38ZVvjBW6hWnJCqJgaBPDIR0PFQ7YiQSLSvzeCI3CV7RapC6/K4TXjBeFYeJ Berg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkzu5ZU5YD9YQZ0ePIOsUvlcUEv4f6/MtQ+nYJ1RFB+R5i8iILvDCM3hXTbo1rnwTfQBxna MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.7.68 with SMTP id h4mr7617738laa.94.1440891425660; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.15.22 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:37:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 01:37:05 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Eric Lombrozo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Splitting BIPs X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 23:37:08 -0000 Concept ACK. As suggested in the other thread, maybe it is worth to start a new BIP draft for this? On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I posted a new draft of the proposal: > http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html > > The subsections still need to be fleshed out a bit more. I'd love any > comments or suggestions. > > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 4:30 PM Eric Lombrozo wrote: >> >> Also, the current "type" attribute needs modification. There are different >> degrees of "standard". Just because a lot of people do X doesn't need to >> mean that doing X is "officially" endorsed by any other devs. At most levels >> below 1, disagreements might be entirely tolerable for many things. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 2:06 PM Eric Lombrozo wrote: >>> >>> >>> Seems like a lot of effort and goodwill is being wasted on contention >>> over things we don't really need to agree upon. In order to help us better >>> prioritize, I propose adding an extra attribute to BIPs indicating their >>> "level" which is split into five as follows: >>> >>> 1. Consensus (hard/soft fork) >>> 2. Peer Services >>> 3. RPC >>> 4. Implementations >>> 5. Applications >>> >>> I posted an example of what such a table might look like here: >>> http://blockhawk.net/bitcoin-dev/bipwiki.html >>> >>> If other folks also think this is a good idea I'll start working on a BIP >>> draft for this. > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >