From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 601128CC for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:33:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23201C3 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagz9 with SMTP id z9so8508812lag.3 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9cG3JHnvnGPQQUpBR4xaQ1bM3VRf0zLvp2LTPjF/iAU=; b=HPuSGWoGJtupysvYhSB/4AazACnYYB7NSJ0j874yT3XhhxNhRLMITxwDKqe7Rb5ka0 3Rnq1FrmrMLnJU1jafY8vszWtqTpETuG5uiHtvOjSW6wfEoZETpsKIs1F2vW4ALBsPhw eF6NmbFWhNMQtL8goBvqpKKxdFQhnJ0SzQKnq1S9fRl+zsGHoJfGMulBQkiA3zZ5alA7 s9oH+2l9t+J51ivF7YcuRCpx2iw2zhKRANa5YJ/N8LEibk+7pxBSWMXBhXg31qDUFDdz qfFvB3NlToH5RYRXk2H+R0PlMkeqmC3oX2JQIRiHBEZmFqTnFsotLDnlgCzpXbeDTFCd XWMw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk22AOATwneFU5tFiYbqFNMJR3fqPdiYVRqm6La9y/fUQI9vQN9N56xmcNl75nY/RNeGQo4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.37.196 with SMTP id a4mr13049248lak.59.1440009237345; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.15.22 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:33:57 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Danny Thorpe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin is an experiment. Why don't we have an experimental hardfork? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 18:33:59 -0000 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Danny Thorpe wrote: > How do "big-block" testnet nodes running this 6382 rev recognize each other > on the peer network? If I set up a 2MB block limit testnet node and -addnode > another 2MB block testnet node (say, JornC's node) to it, and my node mines > a block stuffed with 1.3MB of test txs, the other "big-block" node should > accept my mined block, but it will be rejected / immediately orphaned by the > rest of the testnet network because it exceeds their notion of block size > limit, correct? I have (hopefully) answered your questions in the other thread. Review/testing of #6235 would be also appreciated (to hopefully eventually merge the full #6382 branch into bitcoin/master).