From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5C13499 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:00:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA93B172 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:00:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so30580522wib.1 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QtCptDDgIDLmESS5B9U46FzmCBiGteIjvlzbRRTCLf4=; b=abivQkbt1vtb9kMKCgCbhEA3wdwBW9JF2bvkuC9lfHTYwKx9yKORRd5/GaWzz+4YQj riOtWGMlVNtZocQimWUTctrEO8VtthoZ/ENKYJ+YUrw2VsaAUD8WP3r6UMNqwbT2bnuF cCevrj9shfa+jD5MJLhyTPHi0/boE/XtMxqe0jS7ZDMhL+MWCKkCpfgyTx8/4mVnqIsy RAjqlihGN3UlsyYnM6BZTBDcsB169KyRa/mzRIhK50s4uysogXWKo0208a97LNodAlEZ VX90rK2TQ879ft5jD/emaXqSMaAo8xD0apS0d+T5ud1XCYvbnI+evMHYVWtLgKDKD4rt vPzw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnB1M+FEcBQ0qq2S1SIunuqejYBd7p+G3WtS6IvcFyuB54nQGiledUJs38Kcx/ZAjcoEhqj MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr90048653wjb.133.1438279221664; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.95.168 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:00:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55BA5283.2000405@mail.bihthai.net> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:00:21 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: venzen@mail.bihthai.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Block size following technological growth X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 18:00:24 -0000 Gavin, Pieter, Mark, Gary, can we move the median time discussion to its own thread? http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-July/009731.htm= l I really don't want to fill this thread with that discussion. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Venzen Khaosan = wrote: >> I just had a look your existing Size N testnet code >> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6382 >> and i'll set up a node over the weekend and post its address in that >> PR's conversation. Do you or anyone else already have a node running? >> what blocksize? > > Great! No, I'm not running any node right now at any size. > Take into account that it's not a regular testnet (ie like testnet3), > it's a regtest-like testnet to make mining and simulations cheap. > That also means that anybody can trivially create reorgs, so it is > expected to be used in a controlled environment (you can control which > node creates a new block and when).