From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 908EA47E for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:02:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (mail-wi0-f169.google.com [209.85.212.169]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6C31CC for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so40880303wib.1 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:02:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3R+ddsmn2Agt3u0Q1QTD3XrcW0gX7BN9swcxvJBY5L8=; b=ke8+ewuOJgoCAicNGGq+3mMStiQUz1d5kZh3rPuJ4cFdBWEsXVn3bzCHJrtO3kUhQR RZBRmwSEKV5qajMipt8teWXGox9FX+UQzt/DRRswOlKVKwCtkRbfMrKcuB6maw14vp1U HJytbJfTdz4m0Gqp0S/0ISpnPfiMlJFFsOa0Mh+HsRcKxHh0mRizT64ZWLU1jW9afrB8 RXeEtUprULvFOBED51ojr/RXFTLAdO9MXGYqhZSopw6bhOAQbTRgLVP3/LLVbM66Ouh1 tmMld7+PYcNYv5n6B8HMXm1SEqYYARLtAyPagoJHLoWn+QdlyX3CuYjDkUXldGJp+cVB 30UQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlafbJZDXb+MBFs6+TMCjmfDY57WHs8u3MFkw81m996AlgPfA0N9/H8p+oIsRQ/sleTvQCe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.186.35 with SMTP id fh3mr348758wic.7.1437685340616; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.95.168 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:02:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55B100E2.4040901@bitcoins.info> References: <55B100E2.4040901@bitcoins.info> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:02:20 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Milly Bitcoin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Libconsensus separated repository (was Bitcoin Core and hard forks) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:02:22 -0000 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On 7/23/2015 10:30 AM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n via bitcoin-dev wrote: > >> [4] http://lmgtfy.com/?q=3Dmike+hearn+dictator&l=3D1 Mike has sincerely said that he would like "Bitcoin Core to have a benevolent dictator like other free software projects", and I wanted to make clear that I wasn't putting words in his mouth but it's actually something very easy to find on the internet. But I now realize that the search can be interpreted as me calling him dictator or something of the sort. That wasn't my intention. In fact, Mike's point of view on Bitcoin Core development wasn't even relevant for my example so I shouldn't even have mentioned him in the first place. I apologize for both mistakes, but please let's keep this thread focused on libconsensus. > You spend too much time on reddit. I actually don't spend much time on reddit: I don't particularly like it. But I do spend some time in reddit so, I agree: I spend too much time on reddit.