From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jtimon@jtimon.cc>) id 1Z6cXN-0004fz-U7
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:31:41 +0000
Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z6cXM-0007tP-VF
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:31:41 +0000
Received: by wicnd19 with SMTP id nd19so52743333wic.1
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
	bh=midwRyqRBi37Qg1NsWO2pgtvpo+noEq+a2dMiT46y1g=;
	b=lVJw/b7DFWKw+pEDlwmNa5NYIbnART9rCd4I9f31jRUCcHd6KEf4LOn6OmPskZHD27
	GBWWJJp9fjkldN3WL48zqD+07QCxX25ppiBHkyL5oTIJpWwn/1tMt6rdXOPiC7+A0UQc
	8ue4b91PC7xDWJvI/CykQfznSP01ZiiEXLME4/cy4qVPJLQdQh9CPjy1vCExeidtj9ug
	JLh+dDwrwyo0I81p1fAjSpTCrphiW9XPQh902vFPy0aszR20ACa+wTJMPfm8H74Dynzf
	KItWW4/RUtfoZV4oo+uwVBn22bCH05JdM2f7A+WOe25v8S95cCAvSafGUtI0gFZCVNAo
	E8AA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmk/DHo/it0zh+J7kP092R7dEh5SQmWwdJDKt/CQqN66yCfNNAs+OU9MxVLdOKLbcrL2LrH
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.92.40 with SMTP id cj8mr21653316wib.92.1434882694909;
	Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.139.235 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jun 2015 03:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-z3OVM8vwjo_-FOggSoOWR78w=Rmm+GS7Xv9uSK0jdx1_zdw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDqPBPiDG1BUAipEsLfyE1VFyvdqdoxtYjkKvGDvBQ8qMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE-z3OVM8vwjo_-FOggSoOWR78w=Rmm+GS7Xv9uSK0jdx1_zdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 12:31:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDrs6XwG5imH3pFFDB71kx2dSfhR7kjc6Pw8hvDKqGvTPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	0.2 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1Z6cXM-0007tP-VF
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Motivation and deployment of
 consensus rules changes ([soft/hard]forks)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:31:42 -0000

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com> wrote:
> The off by 1 bug could be fixed by a soft fork.  Since the point is to show
> how a non-controversial hard fork works, it doesn't matter much.

You mean the timewarp fix can be coded as a softfork instead of a
hardfork? How so?
If that's the case, do you have a better candidate?