From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB53ACD for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:51:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA29D3F2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:51:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so2132404wic.0 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hWogaa5GvZ+UQXofLIrQJZss3Y0suOX6Ir/oOWF/J2Y=; b=GlLN8H2XimCo/F0E+fwUtcypGPJrAv92zWXB1ThBv2y+vzjSQ+xrl4MgY+72OMgyip wpj2FFl9tfCrlU7i10jSWRSikWVmvoUuubrlnM2p4x8e/Xp0xabp4NhRDC+y/N26JbB4 O5wflpzbZQBIkoencqBVgTN8zjcAslDa/TqhYysLgtYo8XYAtU+tP44xa/gmnV18r3DS H1eXXxw8PyYuAd9sKCZaJVLT7z37kEZW2VUgbMcyTnRJokcKgqG7c+dz0pSeswf0KxQ4 tsA1jOLj+uMz6JEBIvf1ZggPpk99H9/G0H3EqwJrM2zWEyzzm1htevb0uPXuFpvXHNQu nPtg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkcaL9+iqNab0+SRKU/BLxBmerAFEPnsBeWGqlnbeJRSw+c7mI/HUp5NrWLcGmfKU7EQlh/ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.238.39 with SMTP id vh7mr58792097wjc.109.1441824697356; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.37.5 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.37.5 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:51:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:51:37 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Marcel Jamin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141aa1aea4914051f54f82d X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Yet another blocklimit proposal / compromise X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:51:39 -0000 --089e0141aa1aea4914051f54f82d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sep 9, 2015 8:36 PM, "Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > I propose to: > > a) assess what blocklimit is currently technically possible without driving up costs of running a node up too much. Most systems currently running a fullnode probably have some capacity left. What about the risk of further increasing mining centralization? --089e0141aa1aea4914051f54f82d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Sep 9, 2015 8:36 PM, "Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> I propose to:
>
> a) assess what blocklimit is currently technically possible without driving up costs of running a node up too much. Most systems currently running a fullnode probably have some capacity left.

What about the risk of further increasing mining centralization?

--089e0141aa1aea4914051f54f82d--