From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91857C00 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:33:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 258891FF for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igfj19 with SMTP id j19so62958746igf.1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:33:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=WPK2I/nQP31XM0x5uYKY8gReqH+QDCcRLFLx4JXdgX4=; b=na1qmOjVxq3S/OfxY7u4M8gDp1jMyZLw73bAEBCKpSpwaUEMhKe5yTDDVzpbiUpMV6 ORN5OnKgN7gz2FxNNOnFQduuhln1oFBX1rb4w4+JaeBMHaKicS9xrvkG+YUhKmpHC3UM p+UjDjpZiGQ3Htp8QaspRIh9VVrzpZbjmnF15YWnWaRWLrdok56Id+1hWXwMFwmD8e2i t+apy3H6mYlRXz8cpURFmxdttzBwSJ24dLNDuS8kG0ggTXUGtDGKZBffrI47mtfHoaxP ktSFXZXWlIF1TEiHMOPGHgyQy+tPbPLakgqqGmg2v88+gFpoKkqqsemtzbrxpAlgXpaf 2rTw== X-Received: by 10.50.20.8 with SMTP id j8mr15176042ige.36.1440441229582; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 11:33:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55D6AD19.10305@mattcorallo.com> <20150824152955.GA6924@amethyst.visucore.com> <55DB566F.1010702@mattcorallo.com> <20150824180044.GA5729@muck> <55DB5D49.4050800@mattcorallo.com> <20150824183050.GB7441@amethyst.visucore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150824183050.GB7441@amethyst.visucore.com> From: Eric Lombrozo Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:33:40 +0000 Message-ID: To: "Wladimir J. van der Laan" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd75266cf29c5051e12dbf0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting NODE_BLOOM: Proposed BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 18:33:50 -0000 --047d7bd75266cf29c5051e12dbf0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Indeed, so I don't really have a problem with this proposal. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 11:30 AM Wladimir J. van der Laan wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:15:39PM +0000, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > It would be very useful to not only be able to switch filtering on and > off > > globally...but to be able to switch on a per-connection basis. But then > > You don't necessarily need to send everyone the same nServices bits. > E.g. you could give whitelisted peers special privileges. > > But only advertize the intersection of your supported services (eg those > you offer to the general public) in `addr` messages. > > Wladimir > --047d7bd75266cf29c5051e12dbf0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Indeed, so I don't really have a problem with this propo= sal.


On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, 11:30= AM=C2=A0Wladimir J. van der Laan <l= aanwj@gmail.com> wrote:
On M= on, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:15:39PM +0000, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev wrote:<= br> > It would be very useful to not only be able to switch filtering on and= off
> globally...but to be able to switch on a per-connection basis. But the= n

You don't necessarily need to send everyone the same nServices bits. E.g. you could give whitelisted peers special privileges.

But only advertize the intersection of your supported services (eg those yo= u offer to the general public) in `addr` messages.

Wladimir
--047d7bd75266cf29c5051e12dbf0--