From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
To: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 16:28:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABr1YTfRDUQNivebMvsONV0na7j_sEyw3gii+5r4v8txu+O68w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c582369c-5463-611b-1c32-6348bdfb4a9e@voskuil.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1123 bytes --]
Can you guys please take this discussion elsewhere? Perhaps to
bitcoin-discuss? This is not the place to rehash discussions that have
taken place a million times already. The behavior of the network under
contentious hard forks has been discussed ad nauseum. This mailing list is
for the discussion of new ideas and proposals.
Much appreciated. Thanks.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of
> > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone
> > were to control a majority of full nodes
>
> The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If
> this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply
> spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost.
>
> e
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1732 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-08 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-06 10:16 [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released Tom Zander
2017-01-07 8:13 ` Jonas Schnelli
2017-01-07 8:55 ` Eric Lombrozo
2017-01-07 15:15 ` Tom Zander
2017-01-07 20:12 ` Chris Priest
2017-01-07 20:17 ` David Vorick
2017-01-07 20:26 ` Chris Priest
2017-01-07 21:14 ` Eric Voskuil
2017-01-07 23:10 ` Aymeric Vitte
2017-01-07 23:49 ` Eric Voskuil
2017-01-08 0:28 ` Eric Lombrozo [this message]
2017-01-08 1:58 ` Chris Priest
2017-01-07 21:15 ` Btc Drak
2017-01-07 23:08 ` Tom Zander
2017-01-08 0:32 ` Eric Voskuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABr1YTfRDUQNivebMvsONV0na7j_sEyw3gii+5r4v8txu+O68w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=elombrozo@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=eric@voskuil.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox