From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Anti-transaction replay in a hardfork
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 12:21:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABsx9T0PcbMxjfBJZYveQayhTUb1C3YNZCEMA1T=f9mAfxHypg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93ac7433-470c-d59e-e085-29f0f1613676@mattcorallo.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 700 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> To maximize fork divergence, it might make sense to require this. Any
> sensible proposal for a hard fork would include a change to the sighash
> anyway, so might as well make it required, no?
>
Compatibility with existing transaction-signing software and hardware
should be considered.
I think any hard fork proposal should support a reasonable number of
reasonable-size old-sighash transactions, to allow a smooth transaction of
wallet software and hardware and to support anybody who might have a
hardware wallet locked away in a safe deposit box for years.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1353 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-26 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-24 14:33 [bitcoin-dev] Anti-transaction replay in a hardfork Johnson Lau
2017-01-24 18:52 ` Tom Harding
2017-01-25 4:03 ` Johnson Lau
2017-01-25 19:32 ` Tom Harding
2017-01-27 20:47 ` Johnson Lau
2017-01-27 22:11 ` Tom Harding
2017-01-25 1:22 ` Natanael
2017-01-25 7:05 ` Johnson Lau
2017-01-25 7:15 ` Natanael
2017-01-25 7:21 ` Johnson Lau
2017-01-25 7:29 ` Natanael
2017-01-25 7:42 ` Johnson Lau
2017-01-26 3:29 ` Matt Corallo
2017-01-26 7:03 ` Chris Priest
2017-01-26 7:14 ` Johnson Lau
2017-01-26 8:59 ` Chris Priest
2017-01-26 9:20 ` Johnson Lau
2017-01-26 10:55 ` Edmund Edgar
2017-01-26 15:58 ` Tom Harding
2017-01-26 17:21 ` Gavin Andresen [this message]
2017-01-26 17:41 ` Matt Corallo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABsx9T0PcbMxjfBJZYveQayhTUb1C3YNZCEMA1T=f9mAfxHypg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gavinandresen@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lf-lists@mattcorallo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox