On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Peter Todd <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:pete@petertodd.org" target="_blank">pete@petertodd.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
.... Again, thoughts?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>First: I really like the fidelity bond concept, and want to see it happen.</div><div><br></div><div>RE: OP_RETURN : I&#39;ve got a knee-jerk opposition to the OP_RETURN opcode, because it was the cause of the nastiest bug ever Bitcoin history. So I&#39;d be more comfortable using either OP_FALSE or OP_INVALIDOPCODE for the &quot;provably unspendable&quot; transaction.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>RE: anyone-can-spend transactions:  Thinking aloud... I wonder if we might inadvertently cause &quot;spend storms&quot; on the network; if suddenly there are 11 BTC sitting in an anybody-can-spend txout, I could imagine EVERYBODY on the network trying to race each other to spend it (maybe assuming that there are a few miners on old versions of the software who are too dumb to claim it for themselves).</div>
</div><div><br></div><div><br></div>-- <br>--<br>Gavin Andresen<br>