From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Encrypted Wallet Backward Compatibility
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:26:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABsx9T2-htzpQPxrNqq1Efow2tuUdm5AQGOh0MS0MXvH5pD_5g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309828239.29355.28.camel@Desktop666>
> Despite this being quick, I really want to get 0.3.24 out and rolling so
> that we have us much lead time on 0.4 as possible
Agreed.
> All that needs to happen for that is to agree on either
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/378 or
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/381'
I don't think 0.3.24 "needs" either of those pulls. Fixing
downgrade-to-0.3.24 is low on the priority list, because
downgrade-to-something-before-0.3.24 is just about as likely, and that
has to do something mostly reasonable.
I just pulled https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/379 "Do not use
comma as thousands separator", and pulled a block-chain lock-in at
block 13444. Those were the only issues I think really need to be in
0.3.24.
--
--
Gavin Andresen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-05 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-04 17:52 [Bitcoin-development] Encrypted Wallet Backward Compatibility Matt Corallo
2011-07-04 18:20 ` Luke-Jr
2011-07-04 18:23 ` Gavin Andresen
2011-07-04 20:39 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-05 1:10 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-05 2:26 ` Gavin Andresen [this message]
2011-07-05 2:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2011-07-10 14:21 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-10 19:10 ` Pieter Wuille
2011-07-05 11:03 ` Matt Corallo
2011-07-04 20:59 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-07-04 21:18 ` Douglas Huff
2011-07-04 22:30 ` Gregory Maxwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABsx9T2-htzpQPxrNqq1Efow2tuUdm5AQGOh0MS0MXvH5pD_5g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gavinandresen@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox