public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Andresen <gavin@bitcoinfoundation.org>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:52:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABsx9T2O42pER0b1v9oeU14_K=KVWVqHzcfFmWAhSxoYAn12vg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140618001503.GA8360@savin>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]

RE: most of Peter Todd's comments:

All of that should be separate pull requests.  Big Honking Pull Requests
are harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death.


RE: not relaying/mining transactions with OP_NOPs so miners don't mine
up-version transactions that are invalid under future-new-rules: I'm not
convinced it is worth adding more code (more potential for bugs) to protect
against something that isn't going to happen because up-version
transactions are non-standard (due to version check) in any case.

In any case, lets make that a separate pull request.

I'm going to take the lack of immediate "That's a Terrible Idea!" as rough
consensus...

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen
Chief Scientist, Bitcoin Foundation
https://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1196 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-18 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-17 19:40 [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen
2014-06-18  0:15 ` Peter Todd
2014-06-18 12:52   ` Gavin Andresen [this message]
2014-06-19 10:09     ` Peter Todd
2014-06-19 13:54       ` Gavin Andresen
2014-06-20  0:45         ` Peter Todd
2014-09-29  2:35         ` [Bitcoin-development] New opcodes and transaction version numbers (was 'relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions') Peter Todd
2014-09-29  4:30           ` Alan Reiner
2014-09-29  5:35             ` Peter Todd
2014-06-18  7:42 ` [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Wladimir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABsx9T2O42pER0b1v9oeU14_K=KVWVqHzcfFmWAhSxoYAn12vg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=gavin@bitcoinfoundation.org \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pete@petertodd.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox