From: Gavin Andresen <gavin@bitcoinfoundation.org>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:52:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABsx9T2O42pER0b1v9oeU14_K=KVWVqHzcfFmWAhSxoYAn12vg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140618001503.GA8360@savin>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 768 bytes --]
RE: most of Peter Todd's comments:
All of that should be separate pull requests. Big Honking Pull Requests
are harder to review and are more likely to be bike-shedded to death.
RE: not relaying/mining transactions with OP_NOPs so miners don't mine
up-version transactions that are invalid under future-new-rules: I'm not
convinced it is worth adding more code (more potential for bugs) to protect
against something that isn't going to happen because up-version
transactions are non-standard (due to version check) in any case.
In any case, lets make that a separate pull request.
I'm going to take the lack of immediate "That's a Terrible Idea!" as rough
consensus...
--
--
Gavin Andresen
Chief Scientist, Bitcoin Foundation
https://www.bitcoinfoundation.org/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1196 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-17 19:40 [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen
2014-06-18 0:15 ` Peter Todd
2014-06-18 12:52 ` Gavin Andresen [this message]
2014-06-19 10:09 ` Peter Todd
2014-06-19 13:54 ` Gavin Andresen
2014-06-20 0:45 ` Peter Todd
2014-09-29 2:35 ` [Bitcoin-development] New opcodes and transaction version numbers (was 'relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions') Peter Todd
2014-09-29 4:30 ` Alan Reiner
2014-09-29 5:35 ` Peter Todd
2014-06-18 7:42 ` [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Wladimir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABsx9T2O42pER0b1v9oeU14_K=KVWVqHzcfFmWAhSxoYAn12vg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=gavin@bitcoinfoundation.org \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pete@petertodd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox