From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261C5D7E for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:58:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-lf0-f41.google.com (mail-lf0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75630193 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l143so54480019lfe.2 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 07:58:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=aUGc2TNXHytxRQTw6BYw5zXpXHzqsG6f41FO6Z6T7iI=; b=ZER2vLVwuFWUpbTgRYhs9ghmhMWYHd32XMpnKLUFmvAJVKogXkn8E8hjtaQOKvz8PE gJ0wgi2eQgPV0ROq4PtHgAcJyWKCenlKheazK779vUgXt3K4gFSTf7bT2q+70SsyI7zi md1GFiy6L8lbky/sqipP19YZy7vlGbBGC2+zSFWGDhkeF62qQj2LoQ98Mh+dL8FaWTit kRYZ6pi1n12FbxkL0CFSdzkL7b1PPujPq5BvPOnQ+K5L1iU+nAeuytBBDGWuKAo39UMW AlAfDVhNKau64ZS90QhsVfIglNNRB+05LfDIiVdK0kPBrdlgc9VsujNzYZCVbGtFQeO0 qrrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aUGc2TNXHytxRQTw6BYw5zXpXHzqsG6f41FO6Z6T7iI=; b=jl6GZp6FHywMmM9cpzqP7/VN+dqiwWYFmJAFoU/Txd2dTdtFLPxHm/7s53a9/cKzGi khEUcEodFoPGijBI9P53Ghmih0l1STrwteIr9r5GPxI2XBHvI6GYVFFq8ywjZjzKk+68 d+ZqTdX56Imv/WpHiMRDcqz816RR7et+1zydOvmLHUIMkL5rx8Kbi7kuapcQlUXVQjhc DzPZinXP++c8JciP5h7mEx8LtTmUYbPQjcjKQTzsdi18+H3lYDKhRul0223QcUmT9zfr n8L173Y7eQ6MKsq5CqtXwJrgE44Ce7JxUqIUg3yxOojM+ni1r53/DHQvCKsBx5mKIitE PkRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORPZ0/JoBXDKPAFQlWPsLrJ2br9sKK/5muuj2g9/+duzyeVVX1J5SBJlGLLAevW9lsYLuqxrGhipDRqHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.165.133 with SMTP id o127mr11407741lfe.105.1454428701924; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 07:58:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.79.208 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 07:58:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201602012253.18009.luke@dashjr.org> References: <201602012253.18009.luke@dashjr.org> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 10:58:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Gavin Andresen To: Luke Dashjr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11411c34212a5b052acb92bb X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:18:38 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Process: Status, comments, and copyright licenses X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:58:24 -0000 --001a11411c34212a5b052acb92bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I've completed an initial draft of a BIP that provides clarifications on > the > Status field for BIPs, as well as adding the ability for public comments on > them, and expanding the list of allowable BIP licenses. > > > https://github.com/luke-jr/bips/blob/bip-biprevised/bip-biprevised.mediawiki > > I plan to open discussion of making this BIP an Active status (along with > BIP > 123) a month after initial revisions have completed. Please provide any > objections now, so I can try to address them now and enable consensus to be > reached. > I like the more concrete definitions of the various statuses. I don't like the definition of "consensus". I think the definition described gives too much centralized control to whoever controls the mailing list and the wiki. -- -- Gavin Andresen --001a11411c34212a5b052acb92bb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Feb 1, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev &= lt;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
I've completed an initial draft of a BIP that provides clarific= ations on the
Status field for BIPs, as well as adding the ability for public comments on=
them, and expanding the list of allowable BIP licenses.

https://github.com/luke-= jr/bips/blob/bip-biprevised/bip-biprevised.mediawiki

I plan to open discussion of making this BIP an Active status (along with B= IP
123) a month after initial revisions have completed. Please provide any
objections now, so I can try to address them now and enable consensus to be=
reached.
=C2=A0
=
I like the more concrete definitions of the various statuses= .

I don't like the definition of "consens= us".=C2=A0 I think the definition described gives too much centralized= control to whoever controls the mailing list and the wiki.

--
--
Gavin Andresen
=

--001a11411c34212a5b052acb92bb--