From: "Jorge Timón" <jtimon@monetize.io>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] To prevent arbitrary data storage in txouts — The Ultimate Solution
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:58:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC1+kJOM=QrK4w5O-sqH=CV30v7KCxBZPBS9c+p12XK5UsJ2iw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130410030831.GA12447@savin>
On 4/10/13, Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> Oh, and while we're at it, long-term (hard-fork) it'd be good to change
> the tx hash algorithm to extend the merkle tree into the txouts/txins
> itself, which means that to prove a given txout exists you only need to
> provide it, rather than the full tx.
>
> Currently pruning can't prune a whole tx until every output is spent.
> Make that change and we can prune tx's bit by bit, and still be able to
> serve nodes requesting proof of their UTXO without making life difficult
> for anyone trying to spent old UTXO's. The idea is also part of UTXO
> proof stuff anyway.
I thought about this before, I like the idea very much.
Would such a fork be controversial for anyone?
Would anyone oppose to this for some reason I'm missing?
--
Jorge Timón
http://freico.in/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 2:53 [Bitcoin-development] To prevent arbitrary data storage in txouts — The Ultimate Solution Gregory Maxwell
2013-04-10 3:03 ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10 3:08 ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10 15:58 ` Jorge Timón [this message]
2013-04-11 11:27 ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10 6:53 ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10 7:15 ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-04-10 7:29 ` Peter Todd
2013-04-10 3:52 ` Robert Backhaus
2013-04-10 3:58 ` Gregory Maxwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAC1+kJOM=QrK4w5O-sqH=CV30v7KCxBZPBS9c+p12XK5UsJ2iw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jtimon@monetize.io \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pete@petertodd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox