From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WWNiq-0006iF-5f for Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:21:12 +0000 Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WWNio-0002E5-6g for Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:21:12 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ec20so3219557lab.39 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 03:21:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CL/s+cGt76kkjSSNNI6nySUp+/7TKwIf5HSflhSBUhE=; b=Dt/yManx8TcZA1wxpmOblBX/+bZvk6uBbwk7w73qFLBqkEZ99RgXaScMYE0gdC78AI YTSwmqWcA5NaArO7zCCGtrYYaVE6gOu/Z49sR2OakRDqzmKas1nMOzE95pMLtYmvRRgi HXv+3uvjqAZlFCAX+w2KMWcO4/Wdp3qBYBBP5KN9xwpgIb5gzEtZKpuAu76ToaGyCg2z 3YEr9nd6ttfaCJ3noyVWQWwgAA7smi6XKwS/2XDAotjMy0Yb7O3BxJdk036XQcPx0o8F o4GdLVfoWQTKvgnyyy3xu7k4CYtt1NMTZodwd9ez619OZifCx3ahn7CqyDtO26TvAnnr 7RYA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQniBKw2ZnclU/5LxCEBc+V4mT75e+eXu9Xf9KwdE+6BXKVusII+OdLIA5ILnQLgF9f6EdUD MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.201.1 with SMTP id jw1mr39823lbc.47.1396693263323; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 03:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.60.196 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 03:21:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [85.53.145.179] In-Reply-To: References: <1784069.HYVIiriube@crushinator> <533E29F0.1080901@jerviss.org> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 12:21:03 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= To: Jeff Garzik Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] X-Headers-End: 1WWNio-0002E5-6g Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Finite monetary supply for Bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:21:12 -0000 I like both DD-MM-YYYY and YYYY-MM-DD. I just dislike MM-DD-YYYY and YYYY-D= D-MM. On 4/4/14, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Wladimir wrote: >> Personally I'd prefer to standardize on ISO 8601 (YYYY-MM-DD) dates as >> well. > > +1 for all-numeric, easily computer parse-able without a lookup table, > and naturally sorts correctly in a lexicographic sort. > > English (or any language) should never be in a date format, on a computer= . > > -- > Jeff Garzik > Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist > BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --=20 Jorge Tim=F3n http://freico.in/