From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EBDC002B for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C9260DB7 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:47:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 90C9260DB7 Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=SkYJQIGB X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dj-r5TdDIt50 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 6181E60D91 Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6181E60D91 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2023 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id u12so16373608lfq.0 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:47:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=A1mdRAX1rY8dEeXsRRkOlPPXly8souQq5sgwhqEWzCk=; b=SkYJQIGBcpXBNkJOAXCPJ9StSKE3vpAJTs5W/7Ya2Vs2E3Hwu3U87ECuTi57hEtZZW y6nC9ZBeV+L61BDeQWVXPl1WcTdZRoLopXOYaGLUGd3HDaihho9il+t/rE5JomvkE2cO ju0GJElimfqY9TwBBKf2dVKb8wNbs/oJhyMf0Bd84bHgQZZM+oahbTS5pECIHpHOHrlr 1/vaf5W9huga3WtfD3KRKbzRbft2viH+Of42C5p3vMlTWtvI44hfu7uXctsne9I95FVb K89EjMu8oRRcQxt2/r7ghOxmOm3V2a7t7XF8DLbVhsYxQ2Gw+oXYjpXf7B6XqHjdi/91 WGAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=A1mdRAX1rY8dEeXsRRkOlPPXly8souQq5sgwhqEWzCk=; b=D6Wfvt+lERyJHAcbu9B+4Q9Y/82iYluIhNLCBRMUhRmnym1DJTFupOWZ2T1IR/W3fz TNzmQCU7u/YLJsGB14V+KE4BG24bHaHHo3DIQtAxUN5UwrEjf3y/boyPwZY97hG8M46c mnuIAxIdA2lVCHLB2BOPGCvJ5GtWaXzQf6xFOqVcQ49N48i1BlE4B5rDSDmFJEs23syw RzFsWgukdp7eUJcwZe3iPM1A7VOerHBiBg8eufCTEPRvG1AYru3McUwWR1/eLRtFaspq tScgf65DEMRN0Ywowe0Yv+kKswiTWwUo8NrJNFCvngWhfLAZC9WHFFmw0LeVKEnLp2OI m20Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVu508KSNuPaX3i5iK+w/C4pb+P8vbT6w0dYmUCPFmIMREu59V8 qRCq0883L0nwf7wJmRDiiOuDYc0bFt5A/VHpocNuqSV31OxM9w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+0GILDBe+K8s35SAWbmWvbnWiwRpfiotrw2jB1KVX+tcKg7kDydzw91hVb58qoHFOsyglnV6E867Vn8CMhhCA= X-Received: by 2002:a19:ae0d:0:b0:4d0:7b7:65dc with SMTP id f13-20020a19ae0d000000b004d007b765dcmr32986lfc.122.1675212429520; Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:47:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Christopher Allen Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:46:32 -0800 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c8f74905f398c905" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 01:23:24 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 00:47:13 -0000 --000000000000c8f74905f398c905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All other things being equal, which is better if you need to place a 64-bytes into the Bitcoin blockchain? A traditional OP_RETURN or a spent taproot transaction such as: OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH my64bytes OP_ENDIF I know that the anti-OP_RETURN folk would say =E2=80=9Cneither.=E2=80=9D Bu= t if there was no other choice for a particular protocol, such as a timestamp or a commitment, which is better? Or is there a safer place to put 64 bytes that is more uncensorable but also does not clog UTXO space, only spent transaction `-txindex` space? My best guess was that the taproot method is better, but I suspect there might be some who disagree. I'd love to hear all sides. -- Christopher Allen --000000000000c8f74905f398c905 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All other things being equal, which is better if you need = to place a 64-bytes into the Bitcoin blockchain? A traditional=C2=A0OP_RETU= RN=C2=A0or a spent taproot transaction such as:

OP_FALSE
= OP_IF=C2=A0
OP_PUSH my64bytes
OP_ENDIF

I know that the anti-OP_RETURN folk would say =E2=80=9Cneither.=E2=80=9D = But if there was no other choice for a particular protocol, such as a times= tamp or a commitment, which is better? Or is there a safer place to put 64 = bytes that is more uncensorable but also does not clog UTXO space, only spe= nt transaction `-txindex` space?

My best guess= was that the taproot method is better, but I suspect there might be some w= ho disagree. I'd love to hear all sides.

-- Ch= ristopher Allen

--000000000000c8f74905f398c905--