From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1737EC002B for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6357821EF for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org E6357821EF Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=s7TDu/KY X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKw8O_c5V3MR for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org A9AF9821BF Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9AF9821BF for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id z27so6151571ljq.5 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 10:47:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifewithalacrity-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sPCtNMIaHfU/qaW/8iLU0TnJ/e1XUwI6jvVqUZWBwUE=; b=s7TDu/KYON4WW8juk+E3kSZJRmswcCeNlgxEkpzRrXKcfcbkODUJHbEIwdukRBR8rE iyZf5kg9/Uu3vYkWkSrvQ9TrB8Sz+iU65cS1gAO2YPC8jKfMYatAWnCrIJQaj4GGoKOz Ac93xharNqiXTCTUTsZHvFaqms+CcxEPoLegmEYN/VnTvODqFDY8LXTziObAZLMmrOtE BLBajNEXox35ePMXyRhdZLkZETGqG9TExb8J/KEAGjZ3lMHCam66Pqc9zkzgOVOCGGhE 4EYp4L8Yi2mExYHZNsrlwuf1MDfrgcn0lbcOVhySTWdOye0Mfqvne8b0h65K9it5kTzk 0CbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sPCtNMIaHfU/qaW/8iLU0TnJ/e1XUwI6jvVqUZWBwUE=; b=ov+MNU2eb2hrRtVj7h/3X6TB/ojR0LMmMAIY44wksTNcz1sK9Kl19b1MxKzfy0GONr zM1bCFdA2yEPk5L0JZhaxoZWxpCTeSmi1e120Fo+iQpr+RDY55XWaLPmtmqZNDRlAnpH 0Uoqz38roNBTCj+a3oeQuFusAXbBHoD1xX5OV2IrZPdVeBdnhpx1EyrjeHN15BmGA7zw 0iVR/vcaw51RWQGABFICz0lxU+cIpt11MaRpt3fTVm5qoJPOQd5uukWEmHAMEDtJ+rAv +61LBvZAd7/jXJzyRVX/J3n8DGCe4wlB4r6PYOzqDPM5MML1O7szSARdtpHptNkc+Fqm eAsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWgHYPEZo4wuSU/Nqn42doDh2e37w/J0xGLolSJTxAjA+en4A22 dSP/CKnKfMyTxrfq3aXjsX79g+ru+goEmHFV3H4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/XpOXwDw8PTOsNAWRFFGBOsdXmPANFo+uZo0jCIvk5UaYH+QzzOc/DahVjnLvCjzQQajR5vaI3yNTUYUt86Cs= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8495:0:b0:290:6432:f31 with SMTP id b21-20020a2e8495000000b0029064320f31mr1961503ljh.212.1675450073531; Fri, 03 Feb 2023 10:47:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com> In-Reply-To: <57f780b1-f262-9394-036c-70084320e9cf@peersm.com> From: Christopher Allen Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:47:17 -0800 Message-ID: To: Aymeric Vitte , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078c97205f3d01eb0" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 20:16:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Debate: 64 bytes in OP_RETURN VS taproot OP_FALSE OP_IF OP_PUSH X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 18:47:57 -0000 --00000000000078c97205f3d01eb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:52 AM Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I think the right way so people don't invent deviant things is to > increase the size of OP_RETURN, I don't get this number of 80B, you can > hardly store a signature (of what?) in there and not the "what" if the > "what" is a hash for example > Updating the size of OP_RETURN to support a hash (or two), a signature, and maybe a few more bytes for metadata, would be very helpful in a number of scenarios. It is still a limit but a reasonable one. Otherwise, I think we'll have a lot more inscription-style scenarios. -- Christopher Allen --00000000000078c97205f3d01eb0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 3:52 AM Aymeric Vi= tte via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
I think the right way so people don= 9;t invent deviant things is to
increase the size of OP_RETURN, I don't get this number of 80B, you can=
hardly store a signature (of what?) in there and not the "what" i= f the
"what" is a hash for example

= Updating the size of OP_RETURN to support a hash (or two), a signature, and= maybe a few more bytes for metadata, would be very helpful in a number of = scenarios. It is still a limit but a reasonable one. Otherwise, I think we&= #39;ll have a lot more inscription-style scenarios.

-- Christopher Allen
--00000000000078c97205f3d01eb0--