From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Tds1k-0000k1-9m for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:30:52 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.212.181; envelope-from=watsonbladd@gmail.com; helo=mail-wi0-f181.google.com; Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Tds1j-0006sB-Ib for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:30:52 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hm2so4587328wib.10 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:30:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.84.101 with SMTP id x5mr35686251wiy.18.1354149045426; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:30:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: watsonbladd@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.16.9 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:30:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121128233619.GA6368@giles.gnomon.org.uk> References: <20121128233619.GA6368@giles.gnomon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:30:45 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ItoHS4Pkx4v2LiyVx7HhzDE3k4M Message-ID: From: Watson Ladd To: Roy Badami Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444048ed35afc04cf9764bd X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (watsonbladd[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Tds1j-0006sB-Ib Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol Proposal: Invoices/Payments/Receipts X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 00:30:52 -0000 --f46d0444048ed35afc04cf9764bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 After doing more thinking, what about letting a spend sign more information associated with the transaction, such as a transaction ID provided by the merchant? This seems to solve a lot of the problems being put forward, with much less complexity. --f46d0444048ed35afc04cf9764bd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 After doing more thinking, what about letting a spend sign more information associated with the transaction, such as a transaction ID provided by the merchant? This seems to solve a lot of the problems being put forward, with much less complexity. --f46d0444048ed35afc04cf9764bd--