From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04821C000E; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF82640389; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:04:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrvgwiLuMj0n; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:04:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93A7C40386; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-il1-f176.google.com (mail-il1-f176.google.com [209.85.166.176]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jlrubin@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 17A54IGQ001593 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 01:04:19 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-f176.google.com with SMTP id h18so14039186ilc.5; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 22:04:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HvZoXdnDLH8mV9ts36z6BSlCyEb+yUhqHxz0RTREvMvJUlL4L bVBErXev4ScAvqfxrjXCFp+a7QvfIihGDKmlDgM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy99Wrb/P0iqJ0kayc94StAvWAppB+EBXvzqVEABI/YAJUH+qSvp8TXJ51kmgrlVI0Zn8x4w30w5X+9kRAsEr8= X-Received: by 2002:a92:6f0a:: with SMTP id k10mr64598ilc.105.1628571858712; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 22:04:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jeremy Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 22:04:07 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Billy Tetrud Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000213ca605c92d6fc0" Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion , lightning-dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Lightning-dev] Removing the Dust Limit X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:04:26 -0000 --000000000000213ca605c92d6fc0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" You might be interested in https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1066.pdf which claims that you can make CT computationally hiding and binding, see section 4.6. with respect to utreexo, you might review https://github.com/mit-dci/utreexo/discussions/249?sort=new which discusses tradeoffs between different accumulator designs. With a swap tree, old things that never move more or less naturally "fall leftward", although there are reasons to prefer alternative designs. >> --000000000000213ca605c92d6fc0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You migh= t be interested in=C2=A0h= ttps://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1066.pdf which claims that you can make CT = computationally hiding and binding, see section 4.6.

with respect to utreexo, you might review https://github.com/mit= -dci/utreexo/discussions/249?sort=3Dnew which discusses tradeoffs betwe= en different accumulator designs. With a swap tree, old things that never m= ove more or less naturally "fall leftward", although there are re= asons to prefer alternative designs.


--000000000000213ca605c92d6fc0--