From: Jeremy <jlrubin@mit.edu>
To: "Joachim Strömbergson" <joachimstr@protonmail.com>,
"Bitcoin Protocol Discussion"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Coins: A trustless sidechain protocol
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 17:05:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD5xwhjPRELRdJNKiBbXtUFvrWSiG-1WaZKGV9FDw4=8Fq9YDw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <-8y3dnfO2vpyLPeOF5scfp0c5AZd9FF-_xkr1jL2iT1j02fSMJHix2YQupuOeBRF9v5icwGQbriKFXqd5B1AusZp0X7ENOvQ_q4OGCazueU=@protonmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]
https://utxos.org/uses/
Yes, you should check out the material at the link above. Specifically non
interactive channels solve this problem of one sided opens, where the other
party is passive/offline.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020, 12:42 PM Joachim Strömbergson via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > Instead of using sidechains, just use channel factories.
>
> I am not familiar enough with the latest advancements in this field. Is it
> possible using LN/channel factories to achieve off-line-like participation
> user experience without previous registration with any kind of gateway
> provider? For example, can you go online, join the network [somehow
> instantly], generate address/invoice and then put it somewhere for others
> to later use it when you are off-line? Can you also participate while being
> off-line for very long periods of time without relying on third party
> providers to secure your channels? If not, is using sidechains really
> equally replaceable with LN/CF constructions?
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1403 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-13 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-12 18:54 [bitcoin-dev] Coins: A trustless sidechain protocol Robin Linus
2020-01-13 0:21 ` ZmnSCPxj
2020-01-13 2:02 ` Robin Linus
2020-01-13 2:33 ` ZmnSCPxj
2020-01-13 17:34 ` Joachim Strömbergson
2020-01-13 22:05 ` Jeremy [this message]
2020-01-16 1:21 ` Angel Leon
2020-01-13 18:06 ` Joachim Strömbergson
2020-01-13 19:47 ` Robin Linus
2020-01-13 20:49 ` Joachim Strömbergson
2020-01-13 22:22 ` Robin Linus
2020-01-14 0:53 ` ZmnSCPxj
2020-01-14 2:19 ` Robin Linus
2020-01-14 2:59 ` ZmnSCPxj
2020-01-14 4:12 ` Robin Linus
2020-01-14 15:06 ` Joachim Strömbergson
2020-01-14 15:26 ` ZmnSCPxj
2020-01-15 1:43 ` Robin Linus
2020-01-15 5:46 ` ZmnSCPxj
2020-01-17 4:17 ` Robin Linus
2020-01-17 13:54 ` ZmnSCPxj
2020-01-18 8:21 ` Robin Linus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAD5xwhjPRELRdJNKiBbXtUFvrWSiG-1WaZKGV9FDw4=8Fq9YDw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jlrubin@mit.edu \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joachimstr@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox