From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5ZDL-00070t-LN for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:14:23 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.48; envelope-from=btcdrak@gmail.com; helo=mail-wg0-f48.google.com; Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Y5ZD5-0001Gi-P9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:14:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id y19so18746504wgg.7 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 04:14:01 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.238.104 with SMTP id vj8mr20327686wjc.107.1419855241718; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 04:14:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.25.130 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 04:13:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <3685166.ROb67lzbMM@coldstorage> From: Btc Drak Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:13:41 +0000 Message-ID: To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d141a50b043050b59cfbb X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HK_RANDOM_FROM From username looks random -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM Envelope sender username looks random 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (btcdrak[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Y5ZD5-0001Gi-P9 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Cartographer X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:14:23 -0000 --089e013d141a50b043050b59cfbb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Mike, In all seriousness, are you on the payroll of the NSA or similar to repeatedly attempt to introduce privacy leaks[1] and weaknesses[2] into the ecosystem not to mention logical fallacies like ad hominem attacks; disruption[3] and FUD[4]? Why do you answer objections by hand waving and misdirection as opposed to sound technical reasoning? Remember how hand waving ended for you the last time with your p2p getutxo pull-request[5] and the public flogging the ensued because you refused to accept your implementation was not only flawed but critically vulnerable to attack[6]. Given your intelligence, education and experience, it would seem logical that your behaviour is not random or irrational, but in fact calculated and planned. references: [1] http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2byqz0/mike_hearn_proposes_to_build_vulnerable/ [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1qmbtu/mike_hearn_chair_of_the_bitcoin_foundations_law/ [3] http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/28zts3/mike_hearn_interview_quotes_progress_on_the/ [4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMIzMVABFxQ [5] https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/4351 [6] http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2eq8gi/getutxos_a_convenient_way_to_crash_bitcoind/ --089e013d141a50b043050b59cfbb Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mike,

In all seriousness, are you on the payroll = of the NSA or similar to repeatedly attempt to introduce privacy leaks[1] a= nd weaknesses[2] into the ecosystem not to mention logical fallacies like a= d hominem attacks; disruption[3] and FUD[4]?=C2=A0

Why do you answer objections by hand waving and misdirection as opposed to= sound technical reasoning? Remember how hand waving ended for you the last= time with your p2p getutxo pull-request[5] and the public flogging the ens= ued because you refused to accept your implementation was not only flawed b= ut critically vulnerable to attack[6].

Given y= our intelligence, education and experience, it would seem logical that your= behaviour is not random or irrational, but in fact calculated and planned.=

references:
<= br>
--089e013d141a50b043050b59cfbb--