From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC7EA5E for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:40:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com (mail-yw0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E64F1136 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a10so61127897ywa.3 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:40:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Q4+sekCkKpeOWxp+7X+SB8AUVIHKAri6Qn40djRkffg=; b=B8s0WDeG250sjk+xqYADCQqD5PF0Ke36jXFyIoWpxW5Xm851Rr0e/H06AjypYmYbY3 uDqydFl25Z6D0EJTh2mDW2/0Sk3/j47TT/Yeu3eDojZJMPtyFTRXBUC1csUN6ptph5yX xj3Ml4bPYofD+O+cSJkoMihyIzigU+ZKQg0UV7XDRg+ayxbKfuq0PBcXvCuZTdalu67n vQyaI0TXDQU9SfShKd5Y2A5/jmLo/UnEA7szBU/UoHFj8WoN9oXdwVo5eWrMHyRs+56y YYLe+39D95I0jBf824WCjyZF8d4NqbjGBpngaqV39zd42ADAYSGyhXR2YM9sXVr+r6ji zSvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q4+sekCkKpeOWxp+7X+SB8AUVIHKAri6Qn40djRkffg=; b=MzOYpk19B+K1dcOJRePdO+FAEK/HeK6b+Ia4WXuR25E2zhfDye2fIiaJO3JFuDZ0pm buto83NdNaZMVu00XXLb4WwUbRKzS0JPAI0fUzAb0A+5iMN/Vz6bs4hWxJoLcbF3QN/P M57do0vkxhJAHJzvdgoFzLO7QW4aVoCUAkUKjBl39j+yaiVpOWF0S1La3eK2PjQ/hGOV apz1Pw04ASUF+xutNwAqQMqS3U2gIB6QUzxp8MzJDfG4vyfmuoThhOBGlb+L4JiGnAAD 9044tPJsC46OfW7Ze+ou8M4YtznI8Hy6+UTCCsXTiBU5cdJBYa2d9H7sGs/385Nl++rC DVpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01VRXix8oY4SsjzFIlwk2LUGC9899vJA0TgWQZ4wMQAJM6wk3APPiAcjf0JwxrMevbvfBTVM/zFUnQy6w== X-Received: by 10.129.169.132 with SMTP id g126mr11216844ywh.92.1482129607204; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:40:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.50.77 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:39:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9E1EA42E-B37E-47C9-89B0-37F4CDB2B711@mattcorallo.com> References: <615c88d2a1263810923705c170b25d33@112bit.com> <9E1EA42E-B37E-47C9-89B0-37F4CDB2B711@mattcorallo.com> From: Btc Drak Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:39:46 +0000 Message-ID: To: Matt Corallo , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c145a6abfa6230543fd3095 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:40:33 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Planned Obsolescence X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 06:40:08 -0000 --94eb2c145a6abfa6230543fd3095 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Maybe something trivial like lack of Python 3 dependency on older CentOS builds? On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Please do report bugs to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin . If you > never report them of course they won't get fixed. I'm not aware of test > suite failures and know a bunch of folks who use CentOS, though not sure > how many develop on it. > > On December 18, 2016 12:07:36 PM PST, Alice Wonder via bitcoin-dev < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >On 12/14/2016 07:38 PM, Juan Garavaglia via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > > >> > >> For reasons I am unable to determine a significant number of node > >> operators do not upgrade their clients. > > > >I almost did not update to 0.13.0 because the test suite was failing > >due > >to python errors. How to fix them was posted on bitcointalk. > > > >0.13.1 came with new python errors in the test suite. So I just said > >fuck it. > > > >When the test suite actually works in my fairly standard environment > >(CentOS) in the distributed release, I will upgrade. > > > >Until then, I'm not jumping through hoops to make the test suite work > >and I'm not running clients that haven't passed the test suite so > >that's > >why I almost didn't update to 0.13.0 and haven't updated since. > >_______________________________________________ > >bitcoin-dev mailing list > >bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > >https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > --94eb2c145a6abfa6230543fd3095 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Maybe something trivial like lack of Python 3 dependency o= n older CentOS builds?

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Matt Corallo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wr= ote:
Please do report bugs to ht= tps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin . If you never report them of cou= rse they won't get fixed. I'm not aware of test suite failures and = know a bunch of folks who use CentOS, though not sure how many develop on i= t.

On December 18, 2016 12:07:36 PM PST, Alice Wonder via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>On 12/14/2016 07:38 PM, Juan Garavaglia via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>
>>
>> For reasons I am unable to determine a significant number of node<= br> >> operators do not upgrade their clients.
>
>I almost did not update to 0.13.0 because the test suite was failing >due
>to python errors. How to fix them was posted on bitcointalk.
>
>0.13.1 came with new python errors in the test suite. So I just said >fuck it.
>
>When the test suite actually works in my fairly standard environment >(CentOS) in the distributed release, I will upgrade.
>
>Until then, I'm not jumping through hoops to make the test suite wo= rk
>and I'm not running clients that haven't passed the test suite = so
>that's
>why I almost didn't update to 0.13.0 and haven't updated since.=
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@li= sts.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation= .org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org= /mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

--94eb2c145a6abfa6230543fd3095--