From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Xfn0O-0004fz-Vg for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:42:29 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.214.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.181; envelope-from=btcdrak@gmail.com; helo=mail-ob0-f181.google.com; Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Xfn0O-0005xd-08 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:42:28 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wm4so2563890obc.12 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:42:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.202.97.86 with SMTP id v83mr15956618oib.38.1413711742495; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:42:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.60.232 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:42:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2753630.UjohjSx8jx@1337h4x0r> References: <2753630.UjohjSx8jx@1337h4x0r> From: Btc Drak Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:42:07 +0100 Message-ID: To: xor@freenetproject.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d3fb839ef850505c36a5d X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 1.0 HK_RANDOM_FROM From username looks random -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.6 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM Envelope sender username looks random 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (btcdrak[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Xfn0O-0005xd-08 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP process X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:42:29 -0000 --001a113d3fb839ef850505c36a5d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, xor wrote: > I joined the list when Bitcoin was already in the 10-billions of market > capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is > here > given the importance of Bitcoin. > > So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was > allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting > the > list up won't help with that. I agree. This is also where the best peer review is to be found. Splitting the list will dilute this. --001a113d3fb839ef850505c36a5d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On S= un, Oct 19, 2014 at 8:17 AM, xor <xor@freenetproject.org> wrote:
I joined the list when Bitcoin = was already in the 10-billions of market
capitalization, and it actually really surprised me how low the traffic is = here
given the importance of Bitcoin.

So as a random stranger to the project, I would vote against that if I was<= br> allowed to. There really should be *more* discussion here, and splitting th= e
list up won't help with that.

I agree. = This is also where the best peer review is to be found. Splitting the list = will dilute this.
--001a113d3fb839ef850505c36a5d--