From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2692211A9 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:18:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D1F1256 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 09:18:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so19974429wic.0 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:18:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=jekp3lcKVNtivVNCqKtePvdLVyjoMrV7VvB1qj5wF3g=; b=gmSjlWWo2TtUha/GlCSs0lVEO6RfSddRdniplwzMCOb1dcWg3WKgIhszTVc9GMBjCv GYkvH63qrrN9MdWzOX7kRIHfNB2T1AxfAgId1A6KOdMWniizlwUUaeQboCXYAuViPoU+ yDbaHx4J8xp4XqKfBTrOqeLf+I8gmpXnECwAPFT8nPn6xPQHjJEebrJGK1LFss1XeFim PppYG5RZG65CmD3wU1B6QsT6eOdTjcEZUx/U6jUUqlihGRZOZSes+EHLQx2cgiJkPLSc Lgh39vovpC1a/z4ceR/gn/X6cccfCEOTjyXGYkYMSEN5sOsCFEIrMKyERfe4VXufkshC 3qNw== X-Received: by 10.194.204.195 with SMTP id la3mr8986166wjc.77.1443691092270; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 02:18:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.21.200 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:17:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150924112555.GA21355@amethyst.visucore.com> <201509301757.44035.luke@dashjr.org> <20151001085058.GA10010@amethyst.visucore.com> From: Btc Drak Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 10:17:52 +0100 Message-ID: To: Marcel Jamin Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bae4462b86325052107864a X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core 0.12.0 release schedule X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 09:18:14 -0000 --047d7bae4462b86325052107864a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Any particular reason bitcoin versioning doesn't follow the SemVer spec? > We do: a.b.c, the next major version is, 0.12.0, and maintenance releases are 0.12.1 etc. Release candidates are 0.12.0-rc1 for example. --047d7bae4462b86325052107864a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Marcel Jamin via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Any particular reason bitcoin vers= ioning doesn't follow the SemVer spec?

We do: a.b.c, the next major version is, 0.12.0, and maintenance rele= ases are 0.12.1 etc. Release candidates are 0.12.0-rc1 for example.
--047d7bae4462b86325052107864a--