>"By increasing the size of blocks, transaction fees may not be available to supplement mining revenue and so those who do not have access to cheap or free power to mine;"

why?
wouldn't a bigger block size actually allow for more transactions per block, therefore more fees to be collected, and the cost spread out among many more users (thus still keeping tx fees low). If anything, wouldn't bigger blocksizes are needed to suplement the losses of coinbase rewards being halfed.


On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Ahmed Zsales via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Hello,

Here we propose a long-term solution to replace mining rewards and transactions fees.

BIP [104] is currently a discussion draft only. 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwEbhrQ4ELzBSXpoUjRkc01QUGc/view?usp=sharing

Views and feedback welcome.

Regards,

Ahmed

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev