From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56EBC99 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:50:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7734E1A5 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by widdq5 with SMTP id dq5so4333160wid.1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qQk38LgWlOl0VNxul3Bge+5l3uBzlSgFij5B1ySBOZU=; b=Ob5p1VwGrkHLU00oyA8L/TGeFxuz0Re88BbIx1mUJBgg2M6fPZ+o9Uvds1RZAnHXfs cCtzmBzPHPKleKub1CvKS36O8RIMlwzdw7vdS9cfy8zkQAGXZAPYti4C22cY75ndnIAG KfZK1knV7bn3CzwvvHrepimI9ur85Z8MPm9y49tagjJwjUwQDZMGAseBvFvJ+E/IpHbH 3Wll9k7VmIO/ANcaP4GhYfkthYFXnySnkajODVv8U/SiE2CQkl8A3382qV3fmX8Np+Is 9wnEQpxRrIWnqyalfOqMDgpXkDsCVmPucU1h7tO/IBfX4FUD9/wfaW4QrkVNA+Gv5ete I/eg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.238.39 with SMTP id vh7mr6791633wjc.109.1440708599258; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.52.84 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:49:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Andrew C Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141aa1a48a440051e511c4f X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Questiosn about BIP100 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 20:50:01 -0000 --089e0141aa1a48a440051e511c4f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 20th percentile, though there is some argument to take the 'mode' of several tranches On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Andrew C wrote: > I have been reading the pdf and one thing I can't figure out is what you > mean by "most common floor". Is that the smallest block size that has a > vote or the block size with the most votes or something else? > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:40 AM Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Great questions. >> >> - Currently working on technical BIP draft and implementation, hopefully >> for ScalingBitcoin.org. Only the PDF is publicly available as of today. >> - Yes, the initial deployment is in the same manner as size votes. >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Andrew C via bitcoin-dev < >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Is there any client or code that currently implements BIP 100? And how >>> will it be deployed? WIll the initial fork be deployed in the same manner >>> that the max block size changes are deployed described in the bip? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> bitcoin-dev mailing list >>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >>> >>> >> --089e0141aa1a48a440051e511c4f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
20th percentile, though there is some argument to take the= 'mode' of several tranches


On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:07 AM, An= drew C <achow101@gmail.com> wrote:
I have been reading the pdf and one thing I = can't figure out is what you mean by "most common floor". Is = that the smallest block size that has a vote or the block size with the mos= t votes or something else?
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:40 = AM Jeff Garzik <j= garzik@gmail.com> wrote:
Great questions.

- Currently wo= rking on technical BIP draft and implementation, hopefully for ScalingBitco= in.org.=C2=A0 Only the PDF is publicly available as of today.
- Y= es, the initial deployment is in the same manner as size votes.
<= br>

On Fri, Aug= 21, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Andrew C via bitcoin-dev <bitcoi= n-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Hi all,

Is there any client or code= that currently implements BIP 100? And how will it be deployed? WIll the i= nitial fork be deployed in the same manner that the max block size changes = are deployed described in the bip?

Thanks

____________________________________= ___________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
= bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev



--089e0141aa1a48a440051e511c4f--