*Be civil and considerate*

1. Disagreement is no excuse for poor conduct or personal attacks. A community where people feel uncomfortable is not a productive one.
2. If you would not feel comfortable saying something to a co-worker or acquaintance, it is probably not appropriate on this list either.

*Assume good faith*

1. Remember that protocol & engineering questions are often very complex and difficult to assess. If you disagree, please do so politely, by disputing logical errors and factual premises rather than by attacking individuals.
2. If something seems outrageous, check that you did not misinterpret it. Ask for clarification, rather than assuming the worst.

3. For more, read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith

*Respect time and attention*

1. List members are often busy people. As a result, we value concision and clarity. Emails that are brief and to the point take more time to write, but are repaid many times over when other members of the list make the same effort.
2. Conversations should remain focused and on-topic. If you must change the topic, start a new thread by changing the topic line of your emails. Also, avoid flooding the list with long threads by reading the entire thread first, instead of responding quickly to many emails in a short period of time.
3. New members are welcome, but should be careful to respect the time and energy of long-time list members by doing research in FAQs and with search engines before asking questions.

4. Off-topic threads will be directed to other venues.

*Disclose potential conflicts*

1. List discussions often involve interested parties. We expect participants to be aware when they are conflicted due to employment or other projects they are involved in, and disclose those interests to other project members.
2. When in doubt, over-disclose. Perceived conflicts of interest are important to address, so that the lists’ decisions are credible even when unpopular, difficult or favorable to the interests of one group over another.



Interpretation
--------------

This policy is not exhaustive or complete. It is not a rulebook; it serves to distill our common understanding of a collaborative, shared environment and goals. We expect it to be followed in spirit as much as in the letter.

Enforcement
-----------

Most members of the bitcoin-dev community already comply with this policy, not because of the existence of the policy, but because they have long experience participating in open source communities where the conduct described above is normal and expected. However, failure to observe the code may be grounds for reprimand, probation, or removal from the lists.

If you have concerns about someone’s conduct:

* *Direct contact*: it is always appropriate to email a list member, mention that you think their behavior was out of line, and (if necessary) point them to this document.

* *On-list*: discussing conduct on-list, either as part of another message or as a standalone thread, is always acceptable. Note, though, that approaching the person directly can be better, as it tends to make them less defensive, and it respects the time of other list members, so you probably want to try direct contact first.

* *Moderators*: You can reach the list moderators through the addresses they use for on-list communication.


Moderators

----------

The selection of moderators is intended to be a mix from various projects and roles, and expressly intended to avoid cases where the set of (moderators) equals the set of (bitcoin core committers) or similar.

TBD

Jeff Garzik

[btcdrak?  Johnathan?   Others were listed in the IRC meeting, but the bitcoinstats site is down right here]

Further Context
---------------

Other resources, while not formally part of this code of conduct, can provide useful context and guidance for good behavior.

1. Chapter 6 of Producing OSS, by OSI board member Karl Fogel, describes common best practices for mailing list participation,
particularly [“You Are What You Write”](http://producingoss.com/en/communications.html#you-are-what-you-write) and [“Avoiding Common
Pitfalls"](http://producingoss.com/en/common-pitfalls.html).
2. [RFC 1855](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt), particularly section 2.1.1 (“User Guidelines for mail”), also provides useful
guidelines for sending good emails.
3. [The Ubuntu Code of Conduct](http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/conduct) provides useful guidance for group leaders.

This policy was inspired by [the GNOME Code of Conduct](https://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct/), [the Mozilla Community Participation
Guidelines](https://www.mozilla.org/about/policies/participation.html), [the Ubuntu Code of Conduct](http://www.ubuntu.com/project/about-ubuntu/conduct), and other codes listed at [the OpenHatch list of project codes of conduct](https://openhatch.org/wiki/Project_codes_of_conduct).