From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA03938 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:58:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D0F13E for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wmdw130 with SMTP id w130so48515465wmd.0 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:58:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ymnTuA2Uvb/NkwUWbLVoHfsZsmNu8X+GKcNLBZ89V0Q=; b=aDcqGagZAmTdaPFVd7kNAr2Oqm4GxWm+JfI1MIt/h9o4l2jfyaaIoNqZiw2Lm/QI5X CaQQBJgo/RVBzjYFZNu1RG2JcY1igK6OlcjJkrVDnvu0GPtE/RYxcgyvAfH1+NxuGVgv 6lsGCfG3avAD0GXYUvz6Wz5p/mS5LTOCVpTT64OgbKdpqh6bSWkiKIObE0df5DCCWgm5 vAqN6Yw7J1/XtJqIidz8r/36XhjHxx7EltM35BoiMLdNzJ+ZiKCDdDXEp8qajoj1s0pl ZenZ/8TekvQof1x2FnrVs4mOmP+FpEgdDM/OTXCbOL0wenZkPXk49mkNenJlVn+n4LkG IsCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.88.135 with SMTP id m129mr6951899wmb.67.1447459087144; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.212.79 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 15:58:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1581446.3ZPnhFUSFq@1337h4x0r> References: <1581446.3ZPnhFUSFq@1337h4x0r> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:58:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: xor@freenetproject.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11443518b75be2052474d43c X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Contradiction in BIP65 text? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 23:58:13 -0000 --001a11443518b75be2052474d43c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, xor via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > This clearly says that funds can be frozen. > Can the BIP65-thing be used to freeze funds or can it not be? > This language definitely trips up or worries several folks - it's been mentioned a few times before. The user _chooses_ to freeze _their own_ funds. It is not an unwilling act of force, which many assume when they see the phrase "freeze funds." --001a11443518b75be2052474d43c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, xor via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote= :
This clearly says that funds can be frozen.
Can the BIP65-thing be used to freeze funds or can it not be?


This language definitely trips up or = worries several folks - it's been mentioned a few times before.

The user _chooses_ to freeze _their own_ funds.=C2=A0 It = is not an unwilling act of force, which many assume when they see the phras= e "freeze funds."


= --001a11443518b75be2052474d43c--