From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27EFBB19 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:40:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B14C16A for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicja10 with SMTP id ja10so74164228wic.1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=PwkfOmSGiGYZfI9yXD3F/O5h56Wkni51UbDjDABSYt4=; b=Mw4Vjxc4yjU0OKVXe+zq3RbsWVwdaOFnc5ciLg+QnIukF2eOtweZ0w788wQJTqxWqE teU1y53MbZKd9XVUk7ixqgHsp17SK+9vE2uLUfJJx5GGbDwYr3de2386BQ6e8DuL64kx t2c+8/Do1n+xpyjizUnzC4SqNIqOSI9ahsjjMgXpaW5lL1AnnC2RuTA6t3faoMnuxDJ6 KwskvCFTgrGMz3bDQOCF70iz77AS1RwgKNOD2oisN77F7tUWBIiFjbznbfNtiMJM3D0t agCQysaa8SIFa0oy4fugcxbw/NibmNTzf/9w9YkYAUTDY673uc5QkWHLpwCF8POVlLWm AdDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.238.39 with SMTP id vh7mr39471452wjc.109.1440427241986; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.52.84 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:40:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 10:40:41 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Andrew C Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0141aa1a1560a3051e0f9a9e X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Questiosn about BIP100 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:40:44 -0000 --089e0141aa1a1560a3051e0f9a9e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Great questions. - Currently working on technical BIP draft and implementation, hopefully for ScalingBitcoin.org. Only the PDF is publicly available as of today. - Yes, the initial deployment is in the same manner as size votes. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Andrew C via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there any client or code that currently implements BIP 100? And how > will it be deployed? WIll the initial fork be deployed in the same manner > that the max block size changes are deployed described in the bip? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > --089e0141aa1a1560a3051e0f9a9e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Great questions.

- Currently= working on technical BIP draft and implementation, hopefully for ScalingBi= tcoin.org.=C2=A0 Only the PDF is publicly available as of today.
= - Yes, the initial deployment is in the same manner as size votes.


On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Andrew C via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Hi all,

Is the= re any client or code that currently implements BIP 100? And how will it be= deployed? WIll the initial fork be deployed in the same manner that the ma= x block size changes are deployed described in the bip?

Thanks

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


--089e0141aa1a1560a3051e0f9a9e--