From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D55A87A for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:30:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com [209.85.212.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8751192 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:30:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicja10 with SMTP id ja10so58388388wic.1 for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:30:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yfXBaD4Ey20qX8gsOepjn/MIQfKkNQcMZWkihw15Cz4=; b=Yf0Vmt2e5F2eVIBCI+2xXwugSiQkZfyLikfbtyJtPP5+er4RYeVdTw4FM1eAmgDtmg SMjDupUZc+J78bfvMir0X0jsCBbYDO/9bcAgGf8IzCimapR+lcbPbhkVNPENRsdzgWhl PTXraTmvrEWTFTLq6Lb4Wls3BruGwAUfUb7QjRKe+hy+v3vWgm9rhibi5dUyAdzyaWWV iSu7qzP6x8G12GOBzGQtoUxUf16RDsdkoxSaNO9eww1zPJuREndoSOcQoUyx4BLA8E9P sEaiWNnMmM4/F2NqB27Imp9cGv5plUutOKj0UuRWqxHBBsB5IPSb1QR1vEwiP3A8OHY9 JsEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.176.201 with SMTP id ck9mr22700678wjc.108.1439771405524; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:30:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.140.196 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:30:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 20:30:05 -0400 Message-ID: From: Jeff Garzik To: Levin Keller Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d1eb42f27eb051d76e78f X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Minimum Block Size X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:30:07 -0000 --089e013d1eb42f27eb051d76e78f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 "minimum" an interesting topic. - Traffic levels may not produce a minimum size block - Miners can always collude to produce a lowered maximum block size, a sort of minimum maximum On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Levin Keller via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Hey everyone, > > as with the current "max block size" debate I was wondering: Is anyone > here in favor of a minimum block size (say 2 MB or so)? If so I would be > interested in an exchange (maybe off-list) of ideas. I am in favor of a > lower limit and am giving it quite a bit of thought at the moment. > > Cheers > > Levin > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > --089e013d1eb42f27eb051d76e78f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"minimum" an interesting topic.

- Traffic levels may not produce a minimum size block
- Miners= can always collude to produce a lowered maximum block size, a sort of mini= mum maximum



On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Levin= Keller via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfounda= tion.org> wrote:
Hey everyone,

as with the current "max blo= ck size" debate I was wondering: Is anyone here in favor of a minimum = block size (say 2 MB or so)? If so I would be interested in an exchange (ma= ybe off-list) of ideas. I am in favor of a lower limit and am giving it qui= te a bit of thought at the moment.

Cheers

Levin
=

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


--089e013d1eb42f27eb051d76e78f--