From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A27898 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:29:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-vk0-f67.google.com (mail-vk0-f67.google.com [209.85.213.67]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 886A2141 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vkd66 with SMTP id 66so1664485vkd.2 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:29:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VHotlkwcAPQG6gchyDueo3yAHQpkiGFK5tGXnTzT0vg=; b=0WSE6+x80i6SjZKvuLQh0fA/sfc0182tieu3J4HCAqek7kvhKztlAZzjpTbTKxgl+O qJGny6Y+Pk8pFpV/HZ6XZgf/th09tipTaH2JkSwvUaJ56WEZq0ohwrq50MvYkumhO/7V ksmqO1qtFv9EoXsl41kZ71flf4D4asPRlTcEVgNfZ7xzyppdr2YTHfWegqhOZ3D2fCum jtHVDCVOG0nPpjEwVZ8hQOzBqCWkdcXSQhomJi96cN5Xi33Bsg5eu2ni+YpOdQfoFW8c ATfJYE4Rfi2NegKSfuOOcdwRG10VDHcNF0P2G+9id8lY08t43/Y1ldxSI3mraeV7B0Dh QVkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.163.50 with SMTP id yf18mr6173130vdb.93.1440106170694; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.109.134 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 14:29:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55CB2C57.1070307@mail.bihthai.net> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:29:30 +0100 Message-ID: From: Ahmed Zsales To: Elliot Olds Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2ce38be4231051dc4d817 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] A summary list of all concerns related to not rising the block size X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 21:29:32 -0000 --001a11c2ce38be4231051dc4d817 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Add: For - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer you leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade Against - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases sets a bad precedent On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on >> "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective. >> [...] >> Here's the updated both-thread lists: >> >> >> http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-Gn= jR5NZMZgFb > > > I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site > attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on th= e > block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed. > > Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/ > > Feedback welcome. > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > --001a11c2ce38be4231051dc4d817 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Add:=C2=A0

For - If everyone agrees an = increase is required at some point, The longer you leave it the greater the= numbers who have to upgrade

Against - Insufficien= t testing before moving to production ready releases sets a bad precedent

On Thu,= Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev &l= t;bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
To be clear, these two are just my persona= l lists of arguments on
"each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective.[...]
Here's the updated both-thread lists:

http://0bin.net/pa= ste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb

I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my pe= rsonal notes into a site attempting to list all the strongest arguments and= counterarguments on the block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed= .=C2=A0


Feedback welcome.=C2=A0
=C2=A0

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.= linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail= man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev


--001a11c2ce38be4231051dc4d817--