From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6CE910 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 00:56:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01CBC134 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 00:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id p7so5583705oif.2 for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 17:56:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gOREo/97mCfIwlCxAGVwCW/ZlMX/ocOcFc7LLi2tn8c=; b=d1Sa4CmaqmMuJCKg+sjI5DsGWUaahi0XcZcRY+NgjQnSCqbsPkyn/ab3EePopOdBvK dwBxDCCR2yr5XmPbfq2zfrjjhwhCXEkUEgjwJa8t50EXklAfpOGBWMj9OQcewW/MoFyt q1jQ8c3OBRxav5mtsJpZOOFc4QrsO96wsFojf3od4PbPTne32cH/Ua6puWBQgfrQIUp0 FJY3SqjaX/t4GBSO800rHpDhKucFkrHUWIe2LNHZml0EMMLk05spFH/HfevQG588m/d4 yrgudB6u5G4ffypanPBwqVy/OoqlfhRdXXr4CN4X0uS5IRnFI/JlFr9Vze1FAY9yND1y xXsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gOREo/97mCfIwlCxAGVwCW/ZlMX/ocOcFc7LLi2tn8c=; b=t5d0MnJRiGpixLrxI6E9Kcx+zR75KYiWJvHYhsCtlxDtztFfj8mrVtaMDIP2LxmGsh cRkypw/rj3aqd9zPx8WaUMliZ8EyQJWAF+fbkXIicPbySVyy+d1LdJApLzpg1LP8JJQI Lb4mt8VDgXPivSVVtVvaNyUv+inKdO130lCczuwJCJ0LZVJB51gyhPmJGRU+k4+yxDyA l8LflQm2w7T71dN7ovPmY5UDBfh6gU5rsnfGf/rnh8yDgX/mippybKlz2YyFqwTf3MEw fOnOpBv7k6ZhlPF86rkkaNMXudMgz4xDD1H+/BeoqOugu5kyPnPk3tygjv1YeT37KuEo M/yA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcA+r4/a/oNzuWXxoI2VFRZaMAHhGnOfc6mi4Q6UsNuc66Y+8QhJ nBXRCclhG//5ln8kICdEtMrt8rWWXIZnKCw= X-Received: by 10.202.223.70 with SMTP id w67mr13247194oig.124.1496796971035; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 17:56:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.224.230 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 17:56:10 -0700 (PDT) From: James Hilliard Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 19:56:10 -0500 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] User Activated Soft Fork Split Protection X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 00:56:12 -0000 Due to the proposed calendar(https://segwit2x.github.io/) for the SegWit2x agreement being too slow to activate SegWit mandatory signalling ahead of BIP148 using BIP91 I would like to propose another option that miners can use to prevent a chain split ahead of the Aug 1st BIP148 activation date. The splitprotection soft fork is essentially BIP91 but using BIP8 instead of BIP9 with a lower activation threshold and immediate mandatory signalling lock-in. This allows for a majority of miners to activate mandatory SegWit signalling and prevent a potential chain split ahead of BIP148 activation. This BIP allows for miners to respond to market forces quickly ahead of BIP148 activation by signalling for splitprotection. Any miners already running BIP148 should be encouraged to use splitprotection. 
  BIP: splitprotection
  Layer: Consensus (soft fork)
  Title: User Activated Soft Fork Split Protection
  Author: James Hilliard 
  Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
  Comments-URI:
  Status: Draft
  Type: Standards Track
  Created: 2017-05-22
  License: BSD-3-Clause
           CC0-1.0
==Abstract== This document specifies a coordination mechanism for a simple majority of miners to prevent a chain split ahead of BIP148 activation. ==Definitions== "existing segwit deployment" refer to the BIP9 "segwit" deployment using bit 1, between November 15th 2016 and November 15th 2017 to activate BIP141, BIP143 and BIP147. ==Motivation== The biggest risk of BIP148 is an extended chain split, this BIP provides a way for a simple majority of miners to eliminate that risk. This BIP provides a way for a simple majority of miners to coordinate activation of the existing segwit deployment with less than 95% hashpower before BIP148 activation. Due to time constraints unless immediately deployed BIP91 will likely not be able to enforce mandatory signalling of segwit before the Aug 1st activation of BIP148. This BIP provides a method for rapid miner activation of SegWit mandatory signalling ahead of the BIP148 activation date. Since the primary goal of this BIP is to reduce the chance of an extended chain split as much as possible we activate using a simple miner majority of 65% over a 504 block interval rather than a higher percentage. This BIP also allows miners to signal their intention to run BIP148 in order to prevent a chain split. ==Specification== While this BIP is active, all blocks must set the nVersion header top 3 bits to 001 together with bit field (1<<1) (according to the existing segwit deployment). Blocks that do not signal as required will be rejected. ==Deployment== This BIP will be deployed by "version bits" with a 65%(this can be adjusted if desired) activation threshold BIP9 with the name "splitprotecion" and using bit 2. This BIP starts immediately and is a BIP8 style soft fork since mandatory signalling will start on midnight August 1st 2017 (epoch time 1501545600) regardless of whether or not this BIP has reached its own signalling threshold. This BIP will cease to be active when segwit is locked-in. === Reference implementation === 
// Check if Segregated Witness is Locked In
bool IsWitnessLockedIn(const CBlockIndex* pindexPrev, const
Consensus::Params& params)
{
    LOCK(cs_main);
    return (VersionBitsState(pindexPrev, params,
Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT, versionbitscache) ==
THRESHOLD_LOCKED_IN);
}

// SPLITPROTECTION mandatory segwit signalling.
if ( VersionBitsState(pindex->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus(),
Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SPLITPROTECTION, versionbitscache) ==
THRESHOLD_LOCKED_IN &&
     !IsWitnessLockedIn(pindex->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) &&
// Segwit is not locked in
     !IsWitnessEnabled(pindex->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) ) //
and is not active.
{
    bool fVersionBits = (pindex->nVersion & VERSIONBITS_TOP_MASK) ==
VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS;
    bool fSegbit = (pindex->nVersion &
VersionBitsMask(chainparams.GetConsensus(),
Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT)) != 0;
    if (!(fVersionBits && fSegbit)) {
        return state.DoS(0, error("ConnectBlock(): relayed block must
signal for segwit, please upgrade"), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-no-segwit");
    }
}

// BIP148 mandatory segwit signalling.
int64_t nMedianTimePast = pindex->GetMedianTimePast();
if ( (nMedianTimePast >= 1501545600) &&  // Tue 01 Aug 2017 00:00:00 UTC
     (nMedianTimePast <= 1510704000) &&  // Wed 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 UTC
     (!IsWitnessLockedIn(pindex->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus()) &&
 // Segwit is not locked in
      !IsWitnessEnabled(pindex->pprev, chainparams.GetConsensus())) )
 // and is not active.
{
    bool fVersionBits = (pindex->nVersion & VERSIONBITS_TOP_MASK) ==
VERSIONBITS_TOP_BITS;
    bool fSegbit = (pindex->nVersion &
VersionBitsMask(chainparams.GetConsensus(),
Consensus::DEPLOYMENT_SEGWIT)) != 0;
    if (!(fVersionBits && fSegbit)) {
        return state.DoS(0, error("ConnectBlock(): relayed block must
signal for segwit, please upgrade"), REJECT_INVALID, "bad-no-segwit");
    }
}
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0.14...jameshilliard:splitprotection-v0.14.1 ==Backwards Compatibility== This deployment is compatible with the existing "segwit" bit 1 deployment scheduled between midnight November 15th, 2016 and midnight November 15th, 2017. This deployment is also compatible with the existing BIP148 deployment. This BIP is compatible with BIP91 only if BIP91 activates before it and before BIP148. Miners will need to upgrade their nodes to support splitprotection otherwise they may build on top of an invalid block. While this bip is active users should either upgrade to splitprotection or wait for additional confirmations when accepting payments. ==Rationale== Historically we have used IsSuperMajority() to activate soft forks such as BIP66 which has a mandatory signalling requirement for miners once activated, this ensures that miners are aware of new rules being enforced. This technique can be leveraged to lower the signalling threshold of a soft fork while it is in the process of being deployed in a backwards compatible way. We also use a BIP8 style timeout to ensure that this BIP is compatible with BIP148 and that BIP148 compatible mandatory signalling activates regardless of miner signalling levels. By orphaning non-signalling blocks during the BIP9 bit 1 "segwit" deployment, this BIP can cause the existing "segwit" deployment to activate without needing to release a new deployment. As we approach BIP148 activation it may be desirable for a majority of miners to have a method that will ensure that there is no chain split. ==References== *[https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-March/013714.html Mailing list discussion] *[https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/v0.6.0/src/main.cpp#L1281-L1283 P2SH flag day activation] *[[bip-0009.mediawiki|BIP9 Version bits with timeout and delay]] *[[bip-0016.mediawiki|BIP16 Pay to Script Hash]] *[[bip-0091.mediawiki|BIP91 Reduced threshold Segwit MASF]] *[[bip-0141.mediawiki|BIP141 Segregated Witness (Consensus layer)]] *[[bip-0143.mediawiki|BIP143 Transaction Signature Verification for Version 0 Witness Program]] *[[bip-0147.mediawiki|BIP147 Dealing with dummy stack element malleability]] *[[bip-0148.mediawiki|BIP148 Mandatory activation of segwit deployment]] *[[bip-0149.mediawiki|BIP149 Segregated Witness (second deployment)]] *[https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/ Segwit benefits] ==Copyright== This document is dual licensed as BSD 3-clause, and Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal.