From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd2Pc-0006QW-72 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:52 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.216.44; envelope-from=tier.nolan@gmail.com; helo=mail-qa0-f44.google.com; Received: from mail-qa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wd2PW-0007Kv-Vz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:52 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hw13so1267518qab.31 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.27.212 with SMTP id 78mr62428466qgx.18.1398279641515; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.25.86 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:00:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53580A73.9070208@gk2.sk> References: <53344FF8.7030204@gk2.sk> <53580A73.9070208@gk2.sk> Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 20:00:41 +0100 Message-ID: From: Tier Nolan To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c14d6654493904f7ba5975 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tier.nolan[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Wd2PW-0007Kv-Vz Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:52 -0000 --001a11c14d6654493904f7ba5975 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Pavol Rusnak wrote: > > > Setting the gap limit to high is just a small extra cost in that case. > > Not if you have 100 accounts on 10 different devices. > I meant for a merchant with a server that is handing out hundreds of addresses. The point is to have a single system that is compatible over a large number of systems. --001a11c14d6654493904f7ba5975 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Apr 23, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk> wrote:

> Setting the gap limit to high is just a small extra cost in that case.=

Not if you have 100 accounts on 10 different devices.

I meant for a merchant with a server that is handing o= ut hundreds of addresses.
=C2=A0
The point is t= o have a single system that is compatible over a large number of systems.
--001a11c14d6654493904f7ba5975--