From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Z6Qw5-0001TL-O9 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:08:25 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.173; envelope-from=tier.nolan@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk0-f173.google.com; Received: from mail-qk0-f173.google.com ([209.85.220.173]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Z6Qw5-0001TV-3y for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:08:25 +0000 Received: by qkhu186 with SMTP id u186so80193634qkh.0 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.31.85 with SMTP id f82mr35928775qkf.88.1434838099736; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.85.241 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 23:08:19 +0100 Message-ID: From: Tier Nolan Cc: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147b3ae3ebc740518fa4787 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tier.nolan[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Z6Qw5-0001TV-3y Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [BIP draft] Motivation and deployment of consensus rules changes ([soft/hard]forks) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 22:08:25 -0000 --001a1147b3ae3ebc740518fa4787 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The off by 1 bug could be fixed by a soft fork. Since the point is to show how a non-controversial hard fork works, it doesn't matter much. --001a1147b3ae3ebc740518fa4787 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The off by 1 bug could be fixed by a soft fork.=C2=A0 Sinc= e the point is to show how a non-controversial hard fork works, it doesn= 9;t matter much.
--001a1147b3ae3ebc740518fa4787--