From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 788E09EE for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:20:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (mail-oi0-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F68433 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 22:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n18so49478606oig.2 for ; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:20:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3p4OcAVi33bqXGdUppDeTv0YQxZSSpTnzjkEPi5TNBc=; b=qf61MxR++xBsc92oPXGn+hUjybmGIm644GLMJFHmqVx2gIhUvEpxbpv7KYlBTRV+Ya loR+6fwG6uUu/DnVtt1IO0WrTaPPePdxQG2U8cGGFCQs4C3YPA6h5DO92SwPe/1/b7Ax M0poeDoMVUByJoY+exu0n9e75fyYz4pwJhGMM6dwx4aRiX99qFnjSFsR7F54YZ1ksH1/ LsSEK9z8OD68r9AFoxTQp28dblpHbMt5RhEzAR5Cj0WhjUfIQdSn2IkZ5OxBEzfbjIv6 dL4Q0lTOfcDpUQ/JCf3EH3M67nipdgIqwY7opVWw5telXuz+yIgDPS0w9ZhsHNr2b3xc 64sQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=3p4OcAVi33bqXGdUppDeTv0YQxZSSpTnzjkEPi5TNBc=; b=YORYgxii/lsc1aZSK0VzDXWi435LfPZ8e3oOehpCiVnCHTUa8gYrlRqc27mSIOJZb7 EhgahyriylrJUrzYhaDjNvsZgGT18UoqhZ9J27uPZ6JbNx6EyeXE2FDQv1Mk9LXFM3pj 8wtsowGp0f1sQA5BnvcPCz/mTfidJi6aa6GtyDFXIFPl0r/QotTxiWMGydNf0XO4q0dA ryHXrz5WIiEWHHC0d0UW3ik7sou3VQ6Gj+WEtjWi2HTc2LQv3N5NNEjoGQNElaXTWOZ0 eQFNUOnKPyTBJXhobp26bkk9AHAJl2mU//DIq8NHI7tM0ICll4mnT1dwwwcCNZ69qyCF TFAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjfx8/c3eA1ze1qb87/lBCvA3xZsJTuHlvpx0d/peO7usWowm7i AACu+5G5/f2pyZl5Z5lfs5de0lbX8A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7Kob0LjBthFgWpDGeAMK/tB1H1lAXbZVyFTlQ10KFX2ploWNdjZfenLhWWpV5og8X76U/OJOmX2lELgmmdTV0= X-Received: by 10.202.208.135 with SMTP id j7mr734467oiy.146.1504736443297; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 15:20:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.74.93.71 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:20:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tier Nolan Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 23:20:02 +0100 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146c0c62ef5a605588cc199" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] SF proposal: prohibit unspendable outputs with amount=0 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 22:20:44 -0000 --001a1146c0c62ef5a605588cc199 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs > with null amounts in them? > Someone could have created a timelocked transaction that depends on a zero value output. This could be protected by requiring a tx version number change. Only zero outputs in the new version would be affected. I am not sure how strictly people are sticking to that rule though. --001a1146c0c62ef5a605588cc199 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= ue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs
with null amounts in them?

Someone coul= d have created a timelocked transaction that depends on a zero value output= .

This could be protected by requiring a tx versio= n number change.=C2=A0 Only zero outputs in the new version would be affect= ed.

I am not sure how strictly people are sticking= to that rule though.
--001a1146c0c62ef5a605588cc199--